Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the efficacy of 5% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid for smear layer removal

被引:0
作者
Orhan, Ekim Onur [1 ]
Bahadir, Duygu [1 ]
Akgun, Ceyda [1 ]
Aktas, Seher [1 ]
机构
[1] Eskisehir Osmangazi Univ, Dept Endodont, Fac Dent, Eskisehir, Turkey
关键词
EDTA; image analysis; root canal irrigation; saver; smear layer; IRRIGATING SOLUTIONS; FINAL IRRIGATION; SODIUM-HYPOCHLORITE; CHELATING-AGENTS; SEALING ABILITY; EDTA; NAOCL;
D O I
10.1002/jemt.23582
中图分类号
R602 [外科病理学、解剖学]; R32 [人体形态学];
学科分类号
100101 ;
摘要
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the smear layer removal efficacy of novel Saver (R) irrigating solution including 5% EDTA and to compare the 17% EDTA as the most used counterpart. Forty-four single-rooted teeth were divided into four groups, were instrumented, and irrigated. The smear treatment groups were as follows: sterile distilled water; 5.25% sodium hypochlorite; Saver (R); 17% EDTA. The root samples were blinded. The micrographic images of root samples were collected by scanning electron microscope. The percentages of open dentin tubules were quantified using an image analysis software on micrographs. Two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons was used (p < .05). The 17% EDTA showed the highest percentages of open dentin tubules than the other treatments (p < .01). The mean percentages of open dentin tubules of 17% EDTA revealed statistically highly significant differences than Saver (R) treatment in all root regions (p < .01). Dentin tubules were covered by dense smear layer in distilled water irrigation whereas, the tubular pattern of dentin structure was not observed in hypochlorite irrigation. The commercial Saver (R) product presented to be less cleaning property on the smear layer than 17% EDTA and failed to show any improvement in the removal of smear layer compared with its tested counterpart.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 260
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   SMEAR LAYER REMOVAL WITH DIFFERENT CONCENTRATIONS OF EDTA-ETHYLENEDIAMINE MIXTURES [J].
AKTENER, BO ;
BILKAY, U .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1993, 19 (05) :228-231
[2]   Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols [J].
Al-Ali, M. ;
Sathorn, C. ;
Parashos, P. .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2012, 45 (10) :898-906
[3]   Evaluation of the smear layer removal and decalcification effect of QMix, maleic acid and EDTA on root canal dentine [J].
Ballal, Nidambur Vasudev ;
Jain, Isha ;
Tay, Franklin R. .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2016, 51 :62-68
[4]   Evaluation of SmearOFF, maleic acid and two EDTA preparations in smear layer removal from root canal dentin [J].
Ballal, Nidambur Vasudev A. ;
Jain, Himanshu ;
Rao, Sheetal ;
Johnson, Alexander D. ;
Baeten, John ;
Wolcott, James F. .
ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 77 (01) :28-32
[5]  
BAUMGARTNER JC, 1987, J ENDODONT, V13, P147
[6]   A COMPARISON OF FIVE IRRIGATING SOLUTIONS - A SCANNING ELECTRON-MICROSCOPIC STUDY [J].
BERG, MS ;
JACOBSEN, EL ;
BEGOLE, EA ;
REMEIKIS, NA .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1986, 12 (05) :192-197
[7]  
BYSTROM A, 1981, SCAND J DENT RES, V89, P321
[8]   Smear layer removal by EGTA [J].
Çalt, S ;
Serper, A .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2000, 26 (08) :459-461
[9]   THE INFLUENCE OF THE SMEAR LAYER ON THE SEALING ABILITY OF CANAL OBTURATION [J].
CERGNEUX, M ;
CIUCCHI, B ;
DIETSCHI, JM ;
HOLZ, J .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 1987, 20 (05) :228-232
[10]   THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIFFERENT ENDODONTIC IRRIGATION PROCEDURES ON THE REMOVAL OF THE SMEAR LAYER - A SCANNING ELECTRON-MICROSCOPIC STUDY [J].
CIUCCHI, B ;
KHETTABI, M ;
HOLZ, J .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 1989, 22 (01) :21-28