Centralized Versus Decentralized Detection of Attacks in Stochastic Interconnected Systems

被引:10
作者
Anguluri, Rajasekhar [1 ]
Katewa, Vaibhav [1 ]
Pasqualetti, Fabio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Mech Engn, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
关键词
Detectors; Interconnected systems; Noise measurement; Barium; Stochastic processes; System dynamics; Cyber-physical systems; Attack detection; composite hypothesis testing; generalized likelihood ratio test; interconnected systems; DISTRIBUTED FAULT-DETECTION; CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1109/TAC.2019.2955690
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
We consider a security problem for interconnected systems with linear, discrete, time-invariant, stochastic dynamics, where the objective is to detect exogenous attacks by processing measurements at different locations. We consider centralized and decentralized detectors, which differ primarily in their knowledge of the system model. In particular, a decentralized detector has a model of the dynamics of the isolated subsystems, but is unaware of the interconnection signals that are exchanged among subsystems. Instead, a centralized detector has a model of the entire dynamical system. We characterize the performance of the two detectors and show that, depending on the system and attack parameters, each of the detectors can outperform the other. Hence, it may be possible for the decentralized detector to outperform its centralized counterpart, despite having less information about the system dynamics, and this property is due to the nature of the considered attack detection problem (that is, a simple vs. composite hypothesis testing problem). Finally, we numerically validate our findings on a power system model.
引用
收藏
页码:3903 / 3910
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] ANDERSON T. W., 1958, An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1994, An Introduction to Signal Detection and Estimation, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-2341-0
  • [3] Energy-efficient detection in sensor networks
    Appadwedula, S
    Veeravalli, VV
    Jones, DL
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS, 2005, 23 (04) : 693 - 702
  • [4] BAILEY A, 1995, BEST PAP PROC, P2
  • [5] An alternative point of view on Lepski's method
    Birgé, L
    [J]. STATE OF THE ART IN PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS: FESTSCHRIFT FOR WILLEM R VAN ZWET, 2001, 36 : 113 - 133
  • [6] Decentralized detection in sensor networks
    Chamberland, JF
    Veeravalli, VV
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2003, 51 (02) : 407 - 416
  • [7] Dynamic Attack Detection in Cyber-Physical Systems With Side Initial State Information
    Chen, Yuan
    Kar, Soummya
    Moura, Jose M. F.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2017, 62 (09) : 4618 - 4624
  • [8] Continuous-Time Distributed Observers With Discrete Communication
    Doerfler, Florian
    Pasqualetti, Fabio
    Bullo, Francesco
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2013, 7 (02) : 296 - 304
  • [9] Dorfler Florian, 2011, 2011 49th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton), P1486
  • [10] Secure Estimation and Control for Cyber-Physical Systems Under Adversarial Attacks
    Fawzi, Hamza
    Tabuada, Paulo
    Diggavi, Suhas
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2014, 59 (06) : 1454 - 1467