Recommendations for Benchmarking Preclinical Studies of Nanomedicines

被引:19
作者
Dawidczyk, Charlene M. [1 ,2 ]
Russell, Luisa M. [1 ,2 ]
Searson, Peter C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Inst Nanobiotechnol, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
POLYSTYRENE MICROSPHERES; HEPATIC-UPTAKE; ANIMAL-MODELS; RATS; NANOPARTICLES; SIZES;
D O I
10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1558
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Nanoparticle-based delivery systems provide new opportunities to overcome the limitations associated with traditional smallmolecule drug therapy for cancer and to achieve both therapeutic and diagnostic functions in the same platform. Preclinical trials are generally designed to assess therapeutic potential and not to optimize the design of the delivery platform. Consequently, progress in developing design rules for cancer nanomedicines has been slow, hindering progress in the field. Despite the large number of preclinical trials, several factors restrict comparison and benchmarking of different platforms, including variability in experimental design, reporting of results, and the lack of quantitative data. To solve this problem, we review the variables involved in the design of preclinical trials and propose a protocol for benchmarking that we recommend be included in in vivo preclinical studies of drug-delivery platforms for cancer therapy. This strategy will contribute to building the scientific knowledge base that enables development of design rules and accelerates the translation of new technologies. (C) 2015 AACR.
引用
收藏
页码:4016 / 4020
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Nanomaterial standards for efficacy and toxicity assessment [J].
Adiseshaiah, Pavan P. ;
Hall, Jennifer B. ;
McNeil, Scott E. .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-NANOMEDICINE AND NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY, 2010, 2 (01) :99-112
[2]   Mammalian cells preferentially internalize hydrogel nanodiscs over nanorods and use shape-specific uptake mechanisms [J].
Agarwal, Rachit ;
Singh, Vikramjit ;
Jurney, Patrick ;
Shi, Li ;
Sreenivasan, S. V. ;
Roy, Krishnendu .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (43) :17247-17252
[3]   Particle shape enhances specificity of antibody-displaying nanoparticles [J].
Barua, Sutapa ;
Yoo, Jin-Wook ;
Kolhar, Poornima ;
Wakankar, Aditya ;
Gokarn, Yatin R. ;
Mitragotri, Samir .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (09) :3270-3275
[4]   Nanoparticles in cancer therapy and diagnosis [J].
Brigger, I ;
Dubernet, C ;
Couvreur, P .
ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS, 2002, 54 (05) :631-651
[5]   Animal models and therapeutic molecular targets of cancer: utility and limitations [J].
Cekanova, Maria ;
Rathore, Kusum .
DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2014, 8 :1911-1922
[6]   Timeline - Chemotherapy and the war on cancer [J].
Chabner, BA ;
Roberts, TG .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2005, 5 (01) :65-72
[7]   Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer [J].
Davis, Mark E. ;
Chen, Zhuo ;
Shin, Dong M. .
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2008, 7 (09) :771-782
[8]   Nanomedicines for cancer therapy: state-of-the-art and limitations to pre-clinical studies that hinder future developments [J].
Dawidczyk, Charlene M. ;
Russell, Luisa M. ;
Searson, Peter C. .
FRONTIERS IN CHEMISTRY, 2014, 2
[9]   State-of-the-art in design rules for drug delivery platforms: Lessons learned from FDA-approved nanomedicines [J].
Dawidczyk, Charlene M. ;
Kim, Chloe ;
Park, Jea Ho ;
Russell, Luisa M. ;
Lee, Kwan Hyi ;
Pomper, Martin G. ;
Searson, Peter C. .
JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE, 2014, 187 :133-144
[10]   Animal models in translational medicine: Validation and prediction [J].
Denayer, Tinneke ;
Stoehr, Thomas ;
Van Roy, Maarten .
NEW HORIZONS IN TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2014, 2 (01) :5-11