Informed consent for labor epidurals: a survey of Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology anesthesiologists from the United States

被引:16
作者
Saunders, TA [1 ]
Stein, DJ
Dilger, JR
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Hosp & Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[2] St Lukes Roosevelt Hosp, New York, NY 10025 USA
关键词
informed consent; labor analgesia; epidural analgesia;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.08.002
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Ethicists agree that informed consent is a process rather than just simply the signing of a form. It should provide the patient with needed information and understanding to authorize a procedure. Essential elements of informed consent for women requesting labor epidurals include a description of the procedure, the risks and benefits, and alternative treatments for analgesia including the associated risks and benefits. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine practices and opinions of obstetric anesthesiologists regarding informed consent for parturients. Methods: Questionnaires were sent to 885 anesthesiologists who were members of the Society of Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology based in United States institutions in 2002. Results: Of the 885 questionnaires sent, 448 (51%) were returned with 47% from academic and 47% from private practice institutions. Forty-six percent worked as part of an obstetric anesthesia team; 51% worked in centers where there were > 3000 deliveries/year. Sixty-eight percent suggested that '' parturients in active labor are able to give informed consent for labor epidural analgesia.'' Thirteen percent recommend antenatal anesthesia consults for parturients inquiring about labor epidurals and 41% participated in childbirth classes. Responses did not differ significantly between physicians in academic vs. private practice. More obstetric team practices than non-team practices participated in childbirth education (54% vs. 30%, P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Despite the painful, stressful circumstances confronted by parturients, many respondents (76% in academic, 64% in private practice) thought that women in active labor are able to give informed consent. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 103
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Recall of risks following labor epidural analgesia [J].
Affleck, PJ ;
Waisel, DB ;
Cusick, JM ;
Van Decar, T .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1998, 10 (02) :141-144
[2]  
*ASS AN GREAT BRIT, 1999, INF CONS AN
[3]   Complications of obstetric regional analgesia: how much information is enough? [J].
Bethune, L ;
Harper, N ;
Lucas, DN ;
Robinson, NP ;
Cox, M ;
Lilley, A ;
Yentis, SM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2004, 13 (01) :30-34
[4]  
Bush D J, 1995, Int J Obstet Anesth, V4, P1, DOI 10.1016/0959-289X(95)82040-H
[5]  
Childress J.F., 2001, PRINCIPLES BIOMEDICA, V5th, P77
[6]  
DECLERCQ ER, 2002, LISTENING MOTHERS RE, P22
[7]   An evaluation of informed consent prior to epidural analgesia for labor and delivery [J].
Gerancher, JC ;
Grice, SC ;
Dewan, DM ;
Eisenach, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2000, 9 (03) :168-173
[8]   Ethical aspects of informed consent in obstetric anesthesia - New challenges and solutions [J].
Hoehner, PJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2003, 15 (08) :587-600
[9]   Informed consent for labour epidurals: what labouring women want to know [J].
Jackson, A ;
Henry, R ;
Avery, N ;
VanDenKerkhof, E ;
Milne, B .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2000, 47 (11) :1068-1073
[10]  
KOPP VJ, 2000, PERIOPERATIVE MED, V18, P571