Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial

被引:72
作者
Henry, Amanda [1 ,2 ]
Madan, Arushi [1 ]
Reid, Rachel [1 ,3 ]
Tracy, Sally K. [1 ,3 ]
Austin, Kathryn [2 ]
Welsh, Alec [1 ,2 ]
Challis, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Sch Womens & Childrens Hlth, Kensington, NSW 2033, Australia
[2] Royal Hosp Women, Dept Maternal Fetal Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Midwifery & Womens Hlth Res Unit, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
来源
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH | 2013年 / 13卷
关键词
Induction of labour; Mechanical ripening; Prostaglandin; Foley catheter; Randomised controlled trial; Unfavourable cervix;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2393-13-25
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Induction of labour (IOL) is one of the commonest obstetric interventions, with significant impact on both the individual woman and health service delivery. Outpatient IOL is an attractive option to reduce these impacts. To date there is little data comparing outpatient and inpatient IOL methods, and potential safety concerns (hyperstimulation) if prostaglandins, the standard inpatient IOL medications, are used in the outpatient setting. The purpose of this study was to assess feasibility, clinical effectiveness and patient acceptability of outpatient Foley catheter (OPC) vs. inpatient vaginal PGE2 (IP) for induction of labour (IOL) at term. Methods: Women with an unfavourable cervix requiring IOL at term (N = 101) were randomised to outpatient care using Foley catheter (OPC, n = 50) or inpatient care using vaginal PGE2 (IP, n = 51). OPC group had Foley catheter inserted and were discharged overnight following a reassuring cardiotocograph. IP group received 2 mg/1 mg vaginal PGE2 if nulliparous or 1 mg/1 mg if multiparous. Main outcome measures were inpatient stay (prior to birth, in Birthing Unit, total), mode of birth, induction to delivery interval, adverse reactions and patient satisfaction. Results: OPC group had shorter hospital stay prior to birth (21.3 vs. 32.4 hrs, p < .001), IP were more likely to achieve vaginal birth within 12 hours of presenting to Birthing Unit (53% vs. 28%, p = .01). Vaginal birth rates (66% OPC Vs. 71% IP), total induction to delivery time (33.5 hrs vs. 31.3 hrs) and total inpatient times (96 hrs OPC Vs. 105 hrs IP) were similar. OPC group felt less pain (significant discomfort 26% Vs 58%, p = .003), and had more sleep (5.8 Vs 3.4 hours, p < .001), during cervical preparation, but were more likely to require oxytocin IOL (88 Vs 59%, p = .001). Conclusions: OPC was feasible and acceptable for IOL of women with an unfavourable cervix at term compared to IP, however did not show a statistically significant reduction in total inpatient stay and was associated with increased oxytocin IOL.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy of Foley Catheter Bulb with Intracervical Dinoprostone Gel versus Dinoprostone Gel Alone for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labour: An Observational Study
    Bhowmick, Sohan
    Das, Nilratan
    Das, Tanmoy
    Biswas, Arunava
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2024, 18 (05) : QC1 - QC4
  • [42] Pregnancy outcomes after failed cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 followed by Foley balloon catheter
    Mizrachi, Yossi
    Levy, Michal
    Weiner, Eran
    Bar, Jacob
    Barda, Giulia
    Kovo, Michal
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (19) : 3229 - 3233
  • [43] Mifepristone versus Foley balloon catheter for outpatient cervical ripening at term: A non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
    Carvalho-Afonso, Maria
    Antunes, Marilia
    Fonseca, Andreia
    Ayres-de-Campos, Diogo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2025, 305 : 253 - 259
  • [44] Intra-vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus double-balloon catheter for labor induction in term oligohydramnios
    Shechter-Maor, G.
    Haran, G.
    Sadeh-Mestechkin, D.
    Ganor-Paz, Y.
    Fejgin, M. D.
    Biron-Shental, T.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2015, 35 (02) : 95 - 98
  • [45] Two different regimens of outpatient Foley catheter induction of labor in nulliparas: A randomized trial
    Hong, Jesrine
    Raghavan, Sreella
    Nordiana, Ayub Siti
    Saaid, Rahmah
    Vallikkannu, Narayanan
    Tan, Peng Chiong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2024, 165 (01) : 265 - 274
  • [46] Inpatient versus outpatient induction of labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dong, Susan
    Khan, Maria
    Hashimi, Farahnosh
    Chamy, Caroline
    D'Souza, Rohan
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [47] Oral misoprostol for 48 hours versus a supra cervical foley catheter for 48 hours for induction of labour in post dated pregnancies: a randomized control trial
    Amarasena, Buddhika
    Goonewardene, Malik
    Perera, Rashanthie
    Furukan, Rameez
    CEYLON MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 66 (02) : 77 - 86
  • [48] A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction
    Prager, M.
    Eneroth-Grimfors, E.
    Edlund, M.
    Marions, L.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 115 (11) : 1443 - 1450
  • [49] Comparing induction of labour with oral misoprostol or Foley catheter at term: cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled multi-centre non-inferiority trial
    ten Eikelder, M. L. G.
    van Baaren, G-J
    Rengerink, K. Oude
    Jozwiak, M.
    de Leeuw, J. W.
    Kleiverda, G.
    Evers, I.
    de Boer, K.
    Brons, J.
    Bloemenkamp, K. W. M.
    Mol, B. W.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 (03) : 375 - 383
  • [50] Women's experiences of outpatient induction of labour with double balloon catheter or prostaglandin pessary: A qualitative study
    Coates, Rose
    Cupples, Georgina
    Scamell, Amanda
    McCourt, Christine
    Bhide, Amarnath
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2021, 34 (04) : e406 - e415