Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial

被引:72
作者
Henry, Amanda [1 ,2 ]
Madan, Arushi [1 ]
Reid, Rachel [1 ,3 ]
Tracy, Sally K. [1 ,3 ]
Austin, Kathryn [2 ]
Welsh, Alec [1 ,2 ]
Challis, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Sch Womens & Childrens Hlth, Kensington, NSW 2033, Australia
[2] Royal Hosp Women, Dept Maternal Fetal Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Midwifery & Womens Hlth Res Unit, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
来源
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH | 2013年 / 13卷
关键词
Induction of labour; Mechanical ripening; Prostaglandin; Foley catheter; Randomised controlled trial; Unfavourable cervix;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2393-13-25
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Induction of labour (IOL) is one of the commonest obstetric interventions, with significant impact on both the individual woman and health service delivery. Outpatient IOL is an attractive option to reduce these impacts. To date there is little data comparing outpatient and inpatient IOL methods, and potential safety concerns (hyperstimulation) if prostaglandins, the standard inpatient IOL medications, are used in the outpatient setting. The purpose of this study was to assess feasibility, clinical effectiveness and patient acceptability of outpatient Foley catheter (OPC) vs. inpatient vaginal PGE2 (IP) for induction of labour (IOL) at term. Methods: Women with an unfavourable cervix requiring IOL at term (N = 101) were randomised to outpatient care using Foley catheter (OPC, n = 50) or inpatient care using vaginal PGE2 (IP, n = 51). OPC group had Foley catheter inserted and were discharged overnight following a reassuring cardiotocograph. IP group received 2 mg/1 mg vaginal PGE2 if nulliparous or 1 mg/1 mg if multiparous. Main outcome measures were inpatient stay (prior to birth, in Birthing Unit, total), mode of birth, induction to delivery interval, adverse reactions and patient satisfaction. Results: OPC group had shorter hospital stay prior to birth (21.3 vs. 32.4 hrs, p < .001), IP were more likely to achieve vaginal birth within 12 hours of presenting to Birthing Unit (53% vs. 28%, p = .01). Vaginal birth rates (66% OPC Vs. 71% IP), total induction to delivery time (33.5 hrs vs. 31.3 hrs) and total inpatient times (96 hrs OPC Vs. 105 hrs IP) were similar. OPC group felt less pain (significant discomfort 26% Vs 58%, p = .003), and had more sleep (5.8 Vs 3.4 hours, p < .001), during cervical preparation, but were more likely to require oxytocin IOL (88 Vs 59%, p = .001). Conclusions: OPC was feasible and acceptable for IOL of women with an unfavourable cervix at term compared to IP, however did not show a statistically significant reduction in total inpatient stay and was associated with increased oxytocin IOL.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prospective multi-centre randomised trial comparing induction of labour with a double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone
    Lokkegaard, E.
    Lundstrom, M.
    Kjaer, M. M.
    Christensen, I. J.
    Pedersen, H. B.
    Nyholm, H.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 35 (08) : 797 - 802
  • [32] Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol
    Bracken, Hillary
    Mundle, Shuchita
    Faragher, Brian
    Easterling, Thomas
    Haycox, Alan
    Turner, Mark
    Alfirevic, Zarko
    Winikoff, Beverly
    Weeks, Andrew
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2014, 14
  • [33] Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol
    Hillary Bracken
    Shuchita Mundle
    Brian Faragher
    Thomas Easterling
    Alan Haycox
    Mark Turner
    Zarko Alfirevic
    Beverly Winikoff
    Andrew Weeks
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14
  • [34] Induction of labor using balloon catheter as an outpatient versus prostaglandin as an inpatient: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Merollini, Katharina M. D.
    Beckmann, Michael
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 260 : 124 - 130
  • [35] Outpatient versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes
    Kelly, Anthony J.
    Alfirevic, Zarko
    Ghosh, Arpita
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (11):
  • [36] Double-balloon catheter and sequential vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 alone for induction of labor after previous cesarean section
    Kehl, Sven
    Weiss, Christel
    Wamsler, Michael
    Beyer, Jana
    Dammer, Ulf
    Heimrich, Jutta
    Faschingbauer, Florian
    Suetterlin, Marc
    Beckmann, Matthias W.
    Schleussner, Ekkehard
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2016, 293 (04) : 757 - 765
  • [37] Foley catheter and controlled release dinoprostone versus foley catheter labor induction in nulliparas: a randomized trial
    Vallikkannu, Narayanan
    Laboh, Naumi
    Tan, Peng Chiong
    Hong, Jesrine Gek Shan
    Hamdan, Mukhri
    Lim, Boon Kiong
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2022, 306 (04) : 1027 - 1036
  • [38] Foley catheter and controlled release dinoprostone versus foley catheter labor induction in nulliparas: a randomized trial
    Narayanan Vallikkannu
    Naumi Laboh
    Peng Chiong Tan
    Jesrine Gek Shan Hong
    Mukhri Hamdan
    Boon Kiong Lim
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2022, 306 : 1027 - 1036
  • [39] Foley catheter for induction of labour filled with 30 mL or 60 mL: A randomized controlled trial
    Sandberg, Evelien M.
    Schepers, Evy M.
    van Sitter, Rosalie L.
    Huisman, Claartje M. A.
    van Wijngaarden, Wim J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 211 : 150 - 155
  • [40] Vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus double-balloon catheter for induction of labour for vaginal birth after caesarean section: A retrospective cohort study
    Bullough, Sian
    Southward, Jessica
    Sharp, Andrew
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 259 : 90 - 94