Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial

被引:71
|
作者
Henry, Amanda [1 ,2 ]
Madan, Arushi [1 ]
Reid, Rachel [1 ,3 ]
Tracy, Sally K. [1 ,3 ]
Austin, Kathryn [2 ]
Welsh, Alec [1 ,2 ]
Challis, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Sch Womens & Childrens Hlth, Kensington, NSW 2033, Australia
[2] Royal Hosp Women, Dept Maternal Fetal Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Midwifery & Womens Hlth Res Unit, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
来源
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH | 2013年 / 13卷
关键词
Induction of labour; Mechanical ripening; Prostaglandin; Foley catheter; Randomised controlled trial; Unfavourable cervix;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2393-13-25
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Induction of labour (IOL) is one of the commonest obstetric interventions, with significant impact on both the individual woman and health service delivery. Outpatient IOL is an attractive option to reduce these impacts. To date there is little data comparing outpatient and inpatient IOL methods, and potential safety concerns (hyperstimulation) if prostaglandins, the standard inpatient IOL medications, are used in the outpatient setting. The purpose of this study was to assess feasibility, clinical effectiveness and patient acceptability of outpatient Foley catheter (OPC) vs. inpatient vaginal PGE2 (IP) for induction of labour (IOL) at term. Methods: Women with an unfavourable cervix requiring IOL at term (N = 101) were randomised to outpatient care using Foley catheter (OPC, n = 50) or inpatient care using vaginal PGE2 (IP, n = 51). OPC group had Foley catheter inserted and were discharged overnight following a reassuring cardiotocograph. IP group received 2 mg/1 mg vaginal PGE2 if nulliparous or 1 mg/1 mg if multiparous. Main outcome measures were inpatient stay (prior to birth, in Birthing Unit, total), mode of birth, induction to delivery interval, adverse reactions and patient satisfaction. Results: OPC group had shorter hospital stay prior to birth (21.3 vs. 32.4 hrs, p < .001), IP were more likely to achieve vaginal birth within 12 hours of presenting to Birthing Unit (53% vs. 28%, p = .01). Vaginal birth rates (66% OPC Vs. 71% IP), total induction to delivery time (33.5 hrs vs. 31.3 hrs) and total inpatient times (96 hrs OPC Vs. 105 hrs IP) were similar. OPC group felt less pain (significant discomfort 26% Vs 58%, p = .003), and had more sleep (5.8 Vs 3.4 hours, p < .001), during cervical preparation, but were more likely to require oxytocin IOL (88 Vs 59%, p = .001). Conclusions: OPC was feasible and acceptable for IOL of women with an unfavourable cervix at term compared to IP, however did not show a statistically significant reduction in total inpatient stay and was associated with increased oxytocin IOL.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Induction of labor in nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: a comparison of Foley catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2
    Mizrachi, Yossi
    Levy, Michal
    Bar, Jacob
    Kovo, Michal
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2016, 294 (04) : 725 - 730
  • [22] Double-balloon catheter versus prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labour induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Du, Y. M.
    Zhu, L. Y.
    Cui, L. N.
    Jin, B. H.
    Ou, J. L.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 (06) : 891 - 899
  • [23] Vaginal Prostaglandin E-2 Pessary Versus Gel in induction of Labour at Term
    Akram, H.
    Khanum, Z.
    Rana, T.
    ANNALS OF KING EDWARD MEDICAL UNIVERSITY LAHORE PAKISTAN, 2005, 11 (04): : 370 - 372
  • [24] Prostaglandin insert dinoprostone versus trans-cervical balloon catheter for outpatient labour induction: a randomised controlled trial of feasibility (PROBIT-F)
    Amarnath Bhide
    Philip Sedgwick
    Barbara Barrett
    Georgina Cupples
    Rose Coates
    Rosie Goode
    Sandra Linton
    Christine McCourt
    Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 6
  • [25] Prostaglandin insert dinoprostone versus trans-cervical balloon catheter for outpatient labour induction: a randomised controlled trial of feasibility (PROBIT-F)
    Bhide, Amarnath
    Sedgwick, Philip
    Barrett, Barbara
    Cupples, Georgina
    Coates, Rose
    Goode, Rosie
    Linton, Sandra
    McCourt, Christine
    PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIES, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [26] Induction of labour with prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel in women with one previous caesarean section
    Geetha, Puliyath
    MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2012, 17 (03) : 170 - 175
  • [27] Induction of labour using balloon catheter and prostaglandin gel
    Brown, Jacqueline
    Beckmann, Michael
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 57 (01): : 68 - 73
  • [28] COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF PROSTAGLANDIN E2 VAGINAL TABLET VERSUS GEL FOR THE INDUCTION OF LABOR AT TERM: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Pervaiz, Nadia
    Neelum, Shahzadi
    Bibi, Tauheed
    Pervaiz, Madiha
    GOMAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 21 (04): : 229 - 234
  • [29] RETRACTED: A prospective randomized trial comparing Foley catheter, oxytocin, and combination Foley catheter-oxytocin for labour induction with unfavourable cervix (Retracted Article)
    El Khouly, Nabih I.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 37 (03) : 309 - 314
  • [30] Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel
    Pennell, C. E.
    Henderson, J. J.
    O'Neill, M. J.
    McCleery, S.
    Doherty, D. A.
    Dickinson, J. E.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2009, 116 (11) : 1443 - 1452