Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Acne Vulgaris and Rosacea Clinical Trials From 2011 to 2021 A Systematic Review

被引:8
|
作者
Ly, Sophia [1 ]
Miller, John [2 ]
Tong, Lauren [1 ]
Blake, Lindsay [1 ]
Mostaghimi, Arash [3 ]
Barbieri, John S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Coll Med, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[2] Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Coll Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Dermatol, 41 Ave Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
FIXED-DOSE COMBINATION; INTENSE-PULSED-LIGHT; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE 1.2-PERCENT; IVERMECTIN 1-PERCENT CREAM; ADAPALENE 0.1-PERCENT GEL; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND; ACID FOAM 15-PERCENT; TAZAROTENE 0.045-PERCENT LOTION;
D O I
10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.3911
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Acne and rosacea have substantial implications for quality of life, and it is therefore important to ensure the patient's voice is being captured in pivotal randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Although patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are a valuable tool to capture the patient perspective, little is known about use of PROMs in RCTs on acne and rosacea. OBJECTIVE To characterize the use of PROMs in RCTs on acne and rosacea. EVIDENCE REVIEW A systematic literature search was conducted using the search terms acne vulgaris and rosacea in the following databases: MEDLINE through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. A modified search hedge for RCTs from the McGill Library was applied. All phase 2, 3, and 4 RCTs published between December 31, 2011, through December 31, 2021, that evaluated the efficacy and safety of therapies for acne and rosacea vs any comparator were eligible for inclusion. FINDINGS A total of 2461 publications describing RCTs were identified, of which 206 RCTs met the inclusion criteria (163 trials [79%] on acne and 43 [21%] on rosacea). At least 1 PROM was used in 53% of trials (110) included; PROM use was more common in rosacea RCTs (67% [n = 29]) compared with acne RCTs (50% [n = 81]). At least 1 dermatology-specific (13% [n = 27]) or disease-specific (14% [n = 28]) PROM was included in the RCTs analyzed. Only 7% of trials (14) included a PROM as a primary outcome measure. There was no statistically significant increase in PROM inclusion over the study period (11 of 21 trials in 2011 vs 5 of 12 trials in 2021). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this systematic review, PROMs were included in approximately one-half of acne and rosacea RCTs performed over the study period. In addition, PROMs were rarely used as a primary outcome measure, and inclusion of PROMs has not increased substantially over the past 10 years. Increasing use of PROMs in RCTs can ensure that the patient's perspective is captured during the development of new treatments for acne and rosacea.
引用
收藏
页码:1419 / 1428
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The use of patient-reported outcomes instruments in registered clinical trials: Evidence from ClinicalTrials.gov
    Scoggins, John F.
    Patrick, Donald L.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2009, 30 (04) : 289 - 292
  • [42] Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trials: From an Endpoint to an Intervention in Cancer Care
    Narra, Lakshmi Rekha
    Verdini, Nicholas
    Lapen, Kaitlyn
    Nipp, Ryan
    Gillespie, Erin F.
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 33 (04) : 358 - 366
  • [43] Patient-reported outcomes assessment tools for use in psoriasis in Spain: A systematic review
    Lizan, L.
    Gabas-Rivera, C.
    Belinchon, I
    Dilla, T.
    Huete, T.
    Diaz, S.
    ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS, 2019, 110 (07): : 561 - 584
  • [44] Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trials in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Scoping Review
    Maring, Jan Gerard
    Eijsink, Job F. H.
    Tichelaar, Friso D. D.
    Veluwenkamp-Worawutputtapong, Pawida
    Postma, Maarten J. J.
    Touw, Daan J. J.
    de Groot, Jan Willem B.
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [45] Integration of patient-reported outcomes in multiregional confirmatory clinical trials
    Gnanasakthy, Ari
    DeMuro, Carla
    Boulton, Caroline
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2013, 35 (01) : 62 - 69
  • [46] The use of patient-reported outcome measures to improve patient-related outcomes - a systematic review
    Bonsel, Joshua M.
    Itiola, Ademola J.
    Huberts, Anouk S.
    Bonsel, Gouke J.
    Penton, Hannah
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2024, 22 (01)
  • [47] Patient-reported outcomes in randomized clinical trials of systemic therapy for advanced soft tissue sarcomas in adults: A systematic review
    Roets, Evelyne
    van der Graaf, Winette
    van Riet, Bauke H. G.
    Haas, Rick L.
    Younger, Eugenie
    Sparano, Francesco
    Wilson, Roger
    van der Mierden, Stevie
    Steeghs, Neeltje
    Efficace, Fabio
    Husson, Olga
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2024, 197
  • [48] Inclusion of older patients with cancer in randomised controlled trials with patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review
    Sparano, Francesco
    Aaronson, Neil K.
    Sprangers, Mirjam A. G.
    Fayers, Peter
    Pusic, Andrea
    Kieffer, Jacobien M.
    Cottone, Francesco
    Rees, Jonathan
    Pezold, Mike
    Anota, Amelie
    Charton, Emilie
    Vignetti, Marco
    Wan, Chonghua
    Blazeby, Jane
    Efficace, Fabio
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2019, 9 (04) : 451 - 463
  • [49] Harnessing the patient voice in prostate cancer research: Systematic review on the use of patient-reported outcomes in randomized controlled trials to support clinical decision-making
    Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
    Sparano, Francesco
    Moris, Lisa
    Beyer, Katharina
    Cottone, Francesco
    Sprangers, Mirjam
    Efficace, Fabio
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (12): : 4039 - 4058
  • [50] Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Patients with Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Literature Review of Studies Published Between 2014 and 2021
    Efficace, Fabio
    Cottone, Francesco
    Sparano, Francesco
    Caocci, Giovanni
    Vignetti, Marco
    Chakraborty, Rajshekhar
    CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA, 2022, 22 (07) : 442 - 459