Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Acne Vulgaris and Rosacea Clinical Trials From 2011 to 2021 A Systematic Review

被引:8
|
作者
Ly, Sophia [1 ]
Miller, John [2 ]
Tong, Lauren [1 ]
Blake, Lindsay [1 ]
Mostaghimi, Arash [3 ]
Barbieri, John S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Coll Med, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[2] Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Coll Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Dermatol, 41 Ave Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
FIXED-DOSE COMBINATION; INTENSE-PULSED-LIGHT; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE 1.2-PERCENT; IVERMECTIN 1-PERCENT CREAM; ADAPALENE 0.1-PERCENT GEL; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND; ACID FOAM 15-PERCENT; TAZAROTENE 0.045-PERCENT LOTION;
D O I
10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.3911
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Acne and rosacea have substantial implications for quality of life, and it is therefore important to ensure the patient's voice is being captured in pivotal randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Although patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are a valuable tool to capture the patient perspective, little is known about use of PROMs in RCTs on acne and rosacea. OBJECTIVE To characterize the use of PROMs in RCTs on acne and rosacea. EVIDENCE REVIEW A systematic literature search was conducted using the search terms acne vulgaris and rosacea in the following databases: MEDLINE through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. A modified search hedge for RCTs from the McGill Library was applied. All phase 2, 3, and 4 RCTs published between December 31, 2011, through December 31, 2021, that evaluated the efficacy and safety of therapies for acne and rosacea vs any comparator were eligible for inclusion. FINDINGS A total of 2461 publications describing RCTs were identified, of which 206 RCTs met the inclusion criteria (163 trials [79%] on acne and 43 [21%] on rosacea). At least 1 PROM was used in 53% of trials (110) included; PROM use was more common in rosacea RCTs (67% [n = 29]) compared with acne RCTs (50% [n = 81]). At least 1 dermatology-specific (13% [n = 27]) or disease-specific (14% [n = 28]) PROM was included in the RCTs analyzed. Only 7% of trials (14) included a PROM as a primary outcome measure. There was no statistically significant increase in PROM inclusion over the study period (11 of 21 trials in 2011 vs 5 of 12 trials in 2021). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this systematic review, PROMs were included in approximately one-half of acne and rosacea RCTs performed over the study period. In addition, PROMs were rarely used as a primary outcome measure, and inclusion of PROMs has not increased substantially over the past 10 years. Increasing use of PROMs in RCTs can ensure that the patient's perspective is captured during the development of new treatments for acne and rosacea.
引用
收藏
页码:1419 / 1428
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice
    Snyder, Claire F.
    Aaronson, Neil K.
    LANCET, 2009, 374 (9687): : 369 - 370
  • [32] A Systematic Review of Patient-reported Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Unplanned General Surgery
    Stevens, Daniel J.
    Blencowe, Natalie S.
    McElnay, Philip J.
    Macefield, Rhiannon C.
    Savovic, Jelena
    Avery, Kerry N. L.
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 40 (02) : 267 - 276
  • [33] Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes after Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review
    Mueck, Krislynn M.
    Cherla, Deepa V.
    Taylor, Amy
    Ko, Tien C.
    Liang, Mike K.
    Kao, Lillian S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2018, 226 (02) : 183 - +
  • [34] Patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes in surgery: A systematic review
    Waljee, Jennifer
    McGlinn, Evan P.
    Sears, Erika Davis
    Chung, Kevin C.
    SURGERY, 2014, 155 (05) : 799 - 808
  • [35] Identifying and appraising patient-reported outcome measures on treatment satisfaction in acne: a systematic review
    van Zuuren, E. J.
    Arents, B. W. M.
    Miklas, M.
    Schoones, J. W.
    Tan, J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 185 (01) : 36 - 51
  • [36] Patient-reported outcomes assessment tools for use in psoriasis in Spain: A systematic review
    Lizan, L.
    Gabas-Rivera, C.
    Belinchon, I
    Dilla, T.
    Huete, T.
    Diaz, S.
    ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS, 2019, 110 (07): : 561 - 584
  • [37] The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature
    Valderas, J. M.
    Kotzeva, A.
    Espallargues, M.
    Guyatt, G.
    Ferrans, C. E.
    Halyard, M. Y.
    Revicki, D. A.
    Symonds, T.
    Parada, A.
    Alonso, J.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2008, 17 (02) : 179 - 193
  • [38] The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature
    J. M. Valderas
    A. Kotzeva
    M. Espallargues
    G. Guyatt
    C. E. Ferrans
    M. Y. Halyard
    D. A. Revicki
    T. Symonds
    A. Parada
    J. Alonso
    Quality of Life Research, 2008, 17 : 179 - 193
  • [39] Patient-Reported Outcomes in Pleural Effusions: A Systematic Review
    Mishra, Eleanor K.
    Stanton, Andrew
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [40] The impact of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data from clinical trials: a systematic review and critical analysis
    Rivera, Samantha Cruz
    Kyte, Derek G.
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
    Slade, Anita L.
    McMullan, Christel
    Calvert, Melanie J.
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2019, 17 (01)