Investigating processes in the use of spatial discretization of hydrological conceptual rainfall runoff modelling: a case study for the meso-scale

被引:8
作者
Hellebrand, H. [1 ]
van den Bos, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Grand Duchy Luxtnibourg, Publ Res Ctr Gabriel Lippmann, L-4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg
关键词
distributed conceptual modelling; dominant runoff processes; spatial variability; meso-scale;
D O I
10.1002/hyp.6909
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
In this study a simple modelling approach was applied to identify the need for spatial complexity in representing hydrological processes and their variability over different scales. A data set of 18 basins was used, ranging between 8 and 4011 km(2) in area, located in the Nahe basin (Germany), with daily discharge values for over 30 years. Two different parsimoniously structured models were applied in lumped as well as in spatially distributed according to two distribution classifications: (1) a simple classification based on the lithology expressed in three permeability types and (2) a more complex classification based on seven dominating runoff production processes. The objective of the study was to compare the performances of the models on a local and on a regional scale as well as between the models with a view to identifying the accuracy in capturing the spatial variability of the rainfall-runoff relationships. It was shown that the presence of a specific basin characteristic or process of the distribution classification was not related with higher model performance; only a larger basin size promoted higher model performance. The results of this study also indicated that the permeability generally contained more useful information on the spatial heterogeneity of the hydrological behaviour of the natural system than did a more detailed classification on dominating runoff generation processes. Although model performance was slightly lower for the model that used permeability as a distribution classification, consistency in its parameter values was found, which was lacking with the more complex distribution classification. The latter distribution classification had a higher flexibility to optimize towards the variability of the runoff, which resulted in higher performance, however, process representation was applied inconsistently. Copyright (C) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:2943 / 2952
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   ON THE REPRESENTATIVE ELEMENTARY AREA (REA) CONCEPT AND ITS UTILITY FOR DISTRIBUTED RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING [J].
BLOSCHL, G ;
GRAYSON, RB ;
SIVAPALAN, M .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1995, 9 (3-4) :313-330
[2]  
BLOSCHL G, 1996, SCALE SCALING HYDROL, P162
[3]  
de Wit MJM, 2007, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V82, P351, DOI [10.1007/s10584-006-9195-2, 10.1007/s 10584-006-9195-2]
[4]  
DROGUE G, 2006, INT J CLIMATOL, V26, P785
[5]  
Faeh A. O., 1997, UNDERSTANDING PROCES, P150
[6]  
FLUGEL WA, 1995, SCALE ISSUES HYDROLO, P181
[7]  
Grayson R., 2000, SPATIAL PATTERNS CAT
[8]  
Hamon W.R., 1961, J HYDRAULICS DIVISIO, V87, P107, DOI DOI 10.1061/JYCEAJ.0000599
[9]   Where does water go when it rains? Moving beyond the variable source area concept of rainfall-runoff response [J].
McDonnell, JJ .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2003, 17 (09) :1869-1875
[10]  
Nash J.E., 1970, Elsevier, V10, P282, DOI DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6