Relaxed performance measure approach for reliability-based design optimization

被引:59
作者
Keshtegar, Behrooz [1 ]
Lee, Ikjin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zabol, Dept Civil Engn, PB 98615-538, Zabol, Iran
[2] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Daejeon, South Korea
关键词
Reliability-based design optimization; Relaxed mean value; Performance measure approach; First order reliability method; STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION; DIMENSION REDUCTION; CHAOS CONTROL; INDEX;
D O I
10.1007/s00158-016-1561-8
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The efficiency and robustness of reliability analysis methods are important factors to evaluate the probabilistic constraints in reliability-based design optimization (RBDO). In this paper, a relaxed mean value (RMV) approach is proposed in order to evaluate probabilistic constraints including convex and concave functions in RBDO using the performance measure approach (PMA). A relaxed factor is adaptively determined in the range from 0 to 2 using an inequality criterion to improve the efficiency and robustness of the inverse first-order reliability methods. The performance of the proposed RMV is compared with six existing reliability methods, including the advanced mean value (AMV), conjugate mean value (CMV), hybrid mean value (HMV), chaos control (CC), modified chaos control (MCC), and conjugate gradient analysis (CGA) methods, through four nonlinear concave and convex performance functions and three RBDO problems. The results demonstrate that the proposed RMV is more robust than the AMV, CMV, and HMV for highly concave problems, and slightly more efficient than the CC, MCC, and CGA methods. Furthermore, the proposed relaxed mean value guarantees robust and efficient convergence for RBDO problems with highly nonlinear performance functions.
引用
收藏
页码:1439 / 1454
页数:16
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1971, ITERATIVE SOLUTION L
[2]   Benchmark study of numerical methods for reliability-based design optimization [J].
Aoues, Younes ;
Chateauneuf, Alaa .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2010, 41 (02) :277-294
[3]   A comparison of deterministic, reliability-based and risk-based structural optimization under uncertainty [J].
Beck, Andre Teofilo ;
de Santana Gomes, Wellison Jose .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2012, 28 :18-29
[4]   A sequential approximate programming strategy for reliability-based structural optimization [J].
Cheng, Gengdong ;
Xu, Lin ;
Jiang, Lei .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2006, 84 (21) :1353-1367
[5]   Reliability-based design optimization using a family of methods of moving asymptotes [J].
Cho, Tae Min ;
Lee, Byung Chai .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2010, 42 (02) :255-268
[6]  
DERKIUREGHIAN A, 1991, J ENG MECH-ASCE, V117, P433
[7]   Reliability-based design optimization with equality constraints [J].
Du, Xiaoping ;
Huang, Eiqing .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2007, 72 (11) :1314-1331
[8]   Sequential optimization and reliability assessment method for efficient probabilistic design [J].
Du, XP ;
Chen, W .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2004, 126 (02) :225-233
[9]   A new reliability analysis method based on the conjugate gradient direction [J].
Ezzati, Ghasem ;
Mammadov, Musa ;
Kulkarni, Siddhivinayak .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2015, 51 (01) :89-98
[10]   Optimization and robustness for crashworthiness of side impact [J].
Gu, L ;
Yang, RJ ;
Tho, CH ;
Makowski, M ;
Faruque, O ;
Li, Y .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF VEHICLE DESIGN, 2001, 26 (04) :348-360