Comparison of different nonlinear functions to describe Nelore cattle growth

被引:55
作者
Forni, S. [1 ]
Piles, M. [2 ]
Blasco, A. [3 ]
Varona, L. [4 ]
Oliveira, H. N. [5 ]
Lobo, R. B. [6 ]
Albuquerque, L. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias Agr & Vet, BR-14884900 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Inst Agrofood Res & Technol, Unidad Cunicultura, Caldes De Montbui 68140, Spain
[3] Univ Politecn Valencia, Dept Ciencia Anim, Valencia 46071, Spain
[4] Ctr Univ Lleida, Inst Agrofood Res & Technol, Lleida 25198, Spain
[5] Univ Estadual Paulista, Fac Med Vet & Zootecnia, BR-18618000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[6] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, BR-14049900 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
关键词
Bayesian analysis; beef cattle; growth curve; longitudinal data; model choice; nonlinear function; ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS; MATURE WEIGHT; CURVE;
D O I
10.2527/jas.2008-0845
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This work aims to compare different nonlinear functions for describing the growth curves of Nelore females. The growth curve parameters, their (co) variance components, and environmental and genetic effects were estimated jointly through a Bayesian hierarchical model. In the first stage of the hierarchy, 4 nonlinear functions were compared: Brody, Von Bertalanffy, Gompertz, and logistic. The analyses were carried out using 3 different data sets to check goodness of fit while having animals with few records. Three different assumptions about SD of fitting errors were considered: constancy throughout the trajectory, linear increasing until 3 yr of age and constancy thereafter, and variation following the nonlinear function applied in the first stage of the hierarchy. Comparisons of the overall goodness of fit were based on Akaike information criterion, the Bayesian information criterion, and the deviance information criterion. Goodness of fit at different points of the growth curve was compared applying the Gelfand's check function. The posterior means of adult BW ranged from 531.78 to 586.89 kg. Greater estimates of adult BW were observed when the fitting error variance was considered constant along the trajectory. The models were not suitable to describe the SD of fitting errors at the beginning of the growth curve. All functions provided less accurate predictions at the beginning of growth, and predictions were more accurate after 48 mo of age. The prediction of adult BW using nonlinear functions can be accurate when growth curve parameters and their (co) variance components are estimated jointly. The hierarchical model used in the present study can be applied to the prediction of mature BW in herds in which a portion of the animals are culled before adult age. Gompertz, Von Bertalanffy, and Brody functions were adequate to establish mean growth patterns and to predict the adult BW of Nelore females. The Brody model was more accurate in predicting the birth weight of these animals and presented the best overall goodness of fit.
引用
收藏
页码:496 / 506
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[2]  
Albuquerque LG, 2001, J ANIM SCI, V79, P2776
[3]  
Arango Jesus A., 2002, Genetics and Molecular Research, V1, P51
[4]   GROWTH-PATTERNS OF 2 LINES OF ANGUS CATTLE SELECTED USING PREDICTED GROWTH-PARAMETERS [J].
BELTRAN, JJ ;
BUTTS, WT ;
OLSON, TA ;
KOGER, M .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1992, 70 (03) :734-741
[5]   A Bayesian analysis of the effect of selection for growth rate on growth curves in rabbits [J].
Blasco, A ;
Piles, M ;
Varona, L .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2003, 35 (01) :21-41
[6]  
Brody Samuel, 1945
[7]   GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS FOR MATURE WEIGHT AND OTHER GROWTH MEASURES IN POLLED HEREFORD CATTLE [J].
BULLOCK, KD ;
BERTRAND, JK ;
BENYSHEK, LL .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1993, 71 (07) :1737-1741
[8]  
Burnham K.P., 1998, MODEL SELECTION INFE
[9]   Description and comparison of growth parameters in Chianina and Nelore cattle breeds [J].
Carrijo, SM ;
Duarte, FAM .
GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1999, 22 (02) :187-196
[10]   EXPLAINING THE GIBBS SAMPLER [J].
CASELLA, G ;
GEORGE, EI .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1992, 46 (03) :167-174