Lack of effect of short-term micronized progesterone on bone turnover in postmenopausal women

被引:10
作者
Ikram, Z
Dulipsingh, L
Prestwood, KM
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Ctr Hlth, Ctr Aging, Farmington, CT 06030 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Ctr Hlth, Div Endocrinol & Metab, Farmington, CT 06030 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH & GENDER-BASED MEDICINE | 1999年 / 8卷 / 07期
关键词
D O I
10.1089/jwh.1.1999.8.973
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
A number of studies suggest that progestogens have beneficial effects on bone in postmenopausal women, particularly in combination with estrogen, although these studies have used derivatives that may have estrogenic and androgenic properties in addition to effects mediated by progesterone receptors. Progesterone itself affects only progesterone and glucocorticoid receptors. However, until the development of micronized progesterone (MP), absorption of progesterone preparations was too low to be clinically useful. MP has similar protective effects on the uterus and fewer effects on the lipid profile than other preparations, but its effects on bone are unknown. We tested the hypothesis that MP would alter bone turnover, as measured by serum and urine biochemical markers, in postmenopausal women. Fourteen women aged 65 or over who were not on estrogen replacement received a 6-week course of daily MP (200 mg). Markers of bone turnover were measured in serum and urine collected at baseline, at 6 weeks on MP, and 6 weeks after termination of MP. We also measured total and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and progesterone levels during the study. Markers of bone resorption were urinary free deoxypyridinoline cross-linked N-telopeptides and C-telopeptides of type I collagen. Markers of bone formation were serum osteocalcin, bone alkaline phosphatase, and type I C-terminal and N-terminal procollagen peptides. Using repeated measures analysis of variance, markers of bone formation and resorption did not change with MP treatment in spite of an increase in progesterone levels in all women. We conclude that 6-week treatment with MP alone does not have an effect on bone turnover in postmenopausal women in spite of high physiological levels. These data suggest that effects on bone demonstrated using other progestogen preparations might be due to androgenic or estrogenic effects or that progesterone may not affect bone in estrogen-deficient women.
引用
收藏
页码:973 / 978
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
ABDALLA HI, 1985, OBSTET GYNECOL, V66, P789
[2]  
BAIN SD, 1997, J BONE MINER RES, V12, pS461
[3]  
BAKER V, 1996, END SOC M
[4]   Effects of hormone therapy on bone mineral density - Results from the postmenopausal estrogen/progestin interventions (PEPI) trial [J].
Bush, TL ;
Wells, HB ;
James, MK ;
BarrettConnor, E ;
Marcus, R ;
Greendale, G ;
Hunsberger, S ;
McGowan, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (17) :1389-1396
[5]   Hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women: Urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen monitors therapeutic effect and predicts response of bone mineral density [J].
Chesnut, CH ;
Bell, NH ;
Clark, GS ;
Drinkwater, BL ;
English, SC ;
Johnston, CC ;
Notelovitz, M ;
Rosen, C ;
Cain, DF ;
Flessland, KA ;
Mallinak, NJS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 102 (01) :29-37
[6]   LONG-TERM PROGESTOGEN TREATMENT AND BONE REMODELING IN PERI-MENOPAUSAL WOMEN - A LONGITUDINAL-STUDY [J].
DEQUEKER, J ;
DEMUYLDER, E .
MATURITAS, 1982, 4 (04) :309-313
[7]   Bone health is not affected by luteal phase abnormalities and decreased ovarian progesterone production in female runners [J].
DeSouza, MJ ;
Miller, BE ;
Sequenzia, LC ;
Luciano, AA ;
Ulreich, S ;
Stier, S ;
Prestwood, K ;
Lasley, BL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1997, 82 (09) :2867-2876
[8]   LONG-TERM ESTROGEN REPLACEMENT THERAPY PREVENTS BONE LOSS AND FRACTURES [J].
ETTINGER, B ;
GENANT, HK ;
CANN, CE .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1985, 102 (03) :319-324
[9]  
GALLAGHER JC, 1991, AM J MED, V90, P171
[10]   Physiological action of progesterone in target tissues [J].
Graham, JD ;
Clarke, CL .
ENDOCRINE REVIEWS, 1997, 18 (04) :502-519