Two-dimensional fully kinetic simulations of driven magnetic reconnection with boundary conditions relevant to the Magnetic Reconnection Experiment

被引:27
作者
Dorfman, S. [1 ]
Daughton, W. [2 ]
Roytershteyn, V. [2 ]
Ji, H. [1 ]
Ren, Y. [3 ]
Yamada, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Plasma Phys Lab, Ctr Magnet Self Org Lab & Astrophys Plasma, Princeton, NJ 08543 USA
[2] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Ctr Magnet Self Org Lab & Astrophys Plasma, Madison, WI 53706 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1063/1.2991361
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
Two-dimensional fully kinetic simulations are performed using global boundary conditions relevant to model the Magnetic Reconnection Experiment (MRX) [M. Yamada et al., Phys Plasmas 4, 1936 (1997)]. The geometry is scaled in terms of the ion kinetic scales in the experiment, and a reconnection layer is created by reducing the toroidal current in the flux cores in a manner similar to the actual experiment. The ion-scale features in these kinetic simulations are in remarkable agreement with those observed in MRX, including the reconnection inflow rate and quadrupole field structure. In contrast, there are significant discrepancies in the simulated structure of the electron layer that remain unexplained. In particular, the measured thickness of the electron layers is 3-5 times thicker in MRX than in the kinetic simulations. The layer length is highly sensitive to downstream boundary conditions as well as the time over which the simulation is driven. However, for a fixed set of chosen boundary conditions, an extrapolation of the scaling with the ion to electron mass ratio implies that at realistic mass ratio both the length and width will be too small compared to the experiment. This discrepancy implies that the basic electron layer physics may differ significantly between MRX and the two-dimensional, collisionless simulations. The two leading possibilities to explain the discrepancy are weak Coulomb collisions and three-dimensional effects that are present in the experiment but not included in the simulation model. (C) 2008 American Institute of Physics. [DOI:10.1063/1.2991361]
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Reconnection rates in driven magnetic reconnection [J].
Birn, J. ;
Hesse, M. .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2007, 14 (08)
[2]   MAGNETIC RECONNECTION VIA CURRENT SHEETS [J].
BISKAMP, D .
PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 1986, 29 (05) :1520-1531
[3]   Steady-state properties of driven magnetic reconnection in 2D electron magnetohydrodynamics [J].
Chacon, L. ;
Simakov, Andrei N. ;
Zocco, A. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2007, 99 (23)
[4]   Nonlinear evolution of the lower-hybrid drift instability in a current sheet [J].
Daughton, W ;
Lapenta, G ;
Ricci, P .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2004, 93 (10) :105004-1
[5]   Electromagnetic properties of the lower-hybrid drift instability in a thin current sheet [J].
Daughton, W .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2003, 10 (08) :3103-3119
[6]   Fully kinetic simulations of undriven magnetic reconnection with open boundary conditions [J].
Daughton, William ;
Scudder, Jack ;
Karimabadi, Homa .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2006, 13 (07)
[7]  
DUNGEY JW, 1989, RECONNECTION SPACE P, P15
[8]  
*EPAPS, EPHPAEN15024810, P33501
[9]   FUNDAMENTALS OF PLASMA SIMULATION [J].
FORSLUND, DW .
SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 1985, 42 (1-2) :3-16
[10]   The diffusion region in collisionless magnetic reconnection [J].
Hesse, M ;
Schindler, K ;
Birn, J ;
Kuznetsova, M .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 1999, 6 (05) :1781-1795