How Safe Is Safe Enough? Radiation Risk for a Human Mission to Mars

被引:139
作者
Cucinotta, Francis A. [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Myung-Hee Y. [3 ]
Chappell, Lori J. [3 ]
Huff, Janice L. [3 ]
机构
[1] NASA, Lyndon B Johnson Space Ctr, Space Radiat Program, Houston, TX 77058 USA
[2] Univ Nevada, Dept Hlth Phys & Diagnost Sci, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
[3] Univ Space Res Assoc, Div Space Life Sci, Houston, TX USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2013年 / 8卷 / 10期
关键词
CIRCULATORY DISEASE; IONIZING-RADIATION; SPACE RADIATION; EXPOSURE; IRRADIATION; CANCER; DEPENDENCE; MORTALITY; RAYS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0074988
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Astronauts on a mission to Mars would be exposed for up to 3 years to galactic cosmic rays (GCR) - made up of high-energy protons and high charge (Z) and energy (E) (HZE) nuclei. GCR exposure rate increases about three times as spacecraft venture out of Earth orbit into deep space where protection of the Earth's magnetosphere and solid body are lost. NASA's radiation standard limits astronaut exposures to a 3% risk of exposure induced death (REID) at the upper 95% confidence interval (CI) of the risk estimate. Fatal cancer risk has been considered the dominant risk for GCR, however recent epidemiological analysis of radiation risks for circulatory diseases allow for predictions of REID for circulatory diseases to be included with cancer risk predictions for space missions. Using NASA's models of risks and uncertainties, we predicted that central estimates for radiation induced mortality and morbidity could exceed 5% and 10% with upper 95% CI near 10% and 20%, respectively for a Mars mission. Additional risks to the central nervous system (CNS) and qualitative differences in the biological effects of GCR compared to terrestrial radiation may significantly increase these estimates, and will require new knowledge to evaluate.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Where is the evidence that human exposure to microplastics is safe?
    Leslie, H. A.
    Depledge, M. H.
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 142
  • [32] Health Risk Assessment of Dietary Cadmium Intake: Do Current Guidelines Indicate How Much is Safe?
    Satarug, Soisungwan
    Vesey, David A.
    Gobe, Glenda C.
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2017, 125 (03) : 284 - 288
  • [33] Clean Water Helps but Is Not Enough: Challenges for Safe Replacement Feeding of Infants Exposed to HIV
    Kuhn, Louise
    Aldrovandi, Grace M.
    JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2009, 200 (08) : 1183 - 1185
  • [34] Dose Limits and Countermeasures for Mitigating Radiation Risk in Moon and Mars Exploration
    Boscolo, Daria
    Durante, Marco
    PHYSICS, 2022, 4 (01): : 172 - 184
  • [35] Red risks for a journey to the red planet: The highest priority human health risks for a mission to Mars
    Patel, Zarana S.
    Brunstetter, Tyson J.
    Tarver, William J.
    Whitmire, Alexandra M.
    Zwart, Sara R.
    Smith, Scott M.
    Huff, Janice L.
    NPJ MICROGRAVITY, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [36] How the adaptation of the human microbiome to harsh space environment can determine the chances of success for a space mission to Mars and beyond
    Mortazavi, Seyed Mohammad Javad
    Said-Salman, Ilham
    Mortazavi, Ali Reza
    El Khatib, Sami
    Sihver, Lembit
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [37] Type 2 diabetes, metformin and lactic acidosisudefining the risk and promoting safe practice
    Senior, P. A.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2012, 29 (02) : 161 - 163
  • [38] SAFE-SIDE SCENARIOS FOR FINANCIAL AND BIOMETRICAL RISK
    Christiansen, Marcus C.
    Steffensen, Mogens
    ASTIN BULLETIN, 2013, 43 (03): : 323 - 357
  • [39] Is gold a safe haven for the dynamic risk of foreign exchange?
    Wang, Kuan-Min
    Thi, Thanh-Binh Nguyen
    Lee, Yuan-Ming
    FUTURE BUSINESS JOURNAL, 2021, 7 (01)
  • [40] GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT How safe is growth hormone therapy for children?
    Chernausek, Steven D.
    NATURE REVIEWS ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2010, 6 (05) : 251 - 253