Factors associated with professional support access among a prospective cohort of methamphetamine users

被引:18
作者
Quinn, Brendan [1 ,2 ]
Stoove, Mark [1 ,2 ]
Dietze, Paul [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Burnet Inst, Ctr Populat Hlth, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Amphetamine; Methamphetamine; Treatment utilisation; Treatment access; Community based research; Epidemiology; Prospective cohort study; Melbourne; Australia; Social support; Polysubstance use; REGULAR AMPHETAMINE USERS; NEW-SOUTH-WALES; DRUG-TREATMENT; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; HEROIN USERS; HARMS; INTERVENTIONS; DEPENDENCE; RETENTION; MISUSERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsat.2013.02.003
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Encouraging out-of-treatment methamphetamine users who engage in problematic use patterns to initiate access of drug treatment and other health and support services is a key focus of drug policy. We followed a community-recruited cohort (N = 255) of regular methamphetamine users in Melbourne, Australia, to investigate patterns of engagement with professional support for methamphetamine use and/or associated harms over 12 months. Multivariate logistic regression identified factors independently associated with initiating contact with services during follow-up. Generalised estimating equations identified factors associated with current (at the time of interview) service access. General practitioners were the most common source of professional support during follow-up (24%). Overall, service utilisation was associated with riskier methamphetamine use patterns (e.g., injecting), professional support access for other issues (e.g., mental health), and greater experience of methamphetamine-related harms (e.g., adverse social consequences). These findings provide insights to inform strategies that will improve treatment initiation and retention by methamphetamine users. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 241
页数:7
相关论文
共 52 条
[21]   Amphetamine-related presentations to an inner-city tertiary emergency department: a prospective evaluation [J].
Gray, Suzanne D. ;
Fatovich, Daniel M. ;
McCoubrie, David L. ;
Daly, Frank F. .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2007, 186 (07) :336-339
[22]   Amphetamine-related harms and treatment preferences of regular amphetamine users in Sydney, Australia [J].
Hando, J ;
Topp, L ;
Hall, W .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 1997, 46 (1-2) :105-113
[23]   Methamphetamine-related emergency department utilization and cost [J].
Hendrickson, Robert G. ;
Cloutier, Robert ;
McConnell, K. John .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 15 (01) :23-31
[24]   DRUG-USERS VIEWS ON GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS [J].
HINDLER, C ;
NAZARETH, I ;
KING, M ;
COHEN, J ;
FARMER, R ;
GERADA, C .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6975) :302-302
[25]  
Hosmer W., 2000, Applied Logistic Regression, VSecond
[26]   Contrasting trajectories of heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamine use [J].
Hser, Yih-Ing ;
Huang, David ;
Brecht, Mary-Lynn ;
Li, Libo ;
Evans, Elizabeth .
JOURNAL OF ADDICTIVE DISEASES, 2008, 27 (03) :13-21
[27]   Integrating treatments for methamphetamine abuse: A psychosocial perspective [J].
Huber, A ;
Ling, W ;
Shoptaw, S ;
Gulati, V ;
Brethen, P ;
Rawson, R .
JOURNAL OF ADDICTIVE DISEASES, 1997, 16 (04) :41-50
[28]  
Joe GW, 1998, ADDICTION, V93, P1177
[29]   Stepping through treatment: Reflections on an adaptive treatment strategy among methamphetamine users with depression [J].
Kay-Lambkin, Frances J. ;
Baker, Amanda L. ;
McKetin, Rebecca ;
Lee, Nicole .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 2010, 29 (05) :475-482
[30]  
Kelly E., 2005, 233 NAT DRUG ALC RES