Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study

被引:46
作者
Bahl, R. [1 ]
Van de Venne, M. [2 ]
Macleod, M. [3 ,4 ]
Strachan, B. [1 ]
Murphy, D. J. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] St Michaels Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Bristol BS2 8EG, Avon, England
[2] Royal United Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Bath BA1 3NG, Avon, England
[3] Univ Dundee, Div Maternal & Child Hlth Sci, Ninewells Hosp, Dundee, Scotland
[4] Univ Dundee, Sch Med, Dundee, Scotland
[5] Dublin City Univ, Acad Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Coombe Women & Infants Univ Hosp, Dublin 9, Ireland
[6] Dublin City Univ, Trin Coll, Dublin 9, Ireland
关键词
Mid-cavity; morbidity; operative vaginal delivery; prospective cohort study; rotational; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; KJELLANDS FORCEPS; VACUUM; LABOR; 2ND-STAGE; EPISIOTOMY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.12398
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo compare the maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with alternative instruments used to perform a mid-cavity rotational delivery. DesignA prospective cohort study. SettingTwo university teaching hospitals in Scotland and England. PopulationThree hundred and eighty-one nulliparous women who had a mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery. MethodsA data collection sheet was completed by the research team following delivery. Main outcome measuresPostpartum haemorrhage, third- and fourth-degree perineal tears, low cord pH, neonatal trauma, and failed or sequential operative vaginal delivery. ResultsOne hundred and sixty-three women (42.8%) underwent manual rotation followed by non-rotational forceps delivery, 73 (19.1%) had a rotational vacuum delivery, and 145 (38.1%) delivered with the assistance of rotational (Kielland) forceps. The rates of postpartum haemorrhage were similar when comparing manual rotation with rotational vacuum (adjusted OR1.42, 95%CI 0.66-3.98), and when comparing manual rotation with Kielland forceps (adjusted OR1.22, 95%CI 0.71-2.88). The results were comparable for third- and fourth-degree perineal tears (adjusted OR0.85, 95%CI 0.13-1.89; adjusted OR0.94, 95%CI 0.39-1.82), low cord pH (adjusted OR1.76, 95%CI 0.44-6.91; adjusted OR1.12, 95%CI 0.44-2.83), neonatal trauma (adjusted OR0.50, 95%CI 0.16-1.55; adjusted OR3.25, 95%CI 0.65-16.17), and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (adjusted OR1.47, 95%CI 0.45-4.81; adjusted OR1.04, 95%CI 0.49-2.19). The sequential use of instruments was less likely with manual rotation and forceps than with rotational vacuum delivery (0.6 versus 36.9%, OR0.01, 95%CI 0.002-0.090). ConclusionsMaternal and perinatal outcomes are comparable with Kielland forceps, vacuum extraction, and manual rotation, with few serious adverse outcomes. With appropriate training mid-cavity rotational delivery can be practiced safely, including the use of Kielland forceps.
引用
收藏
页码:1526 / 1533
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]   Randomised clinical trial to assess anal sphincter function following forceps or vacuum assisted vaginal delivery [J].
Fitzpatrick, M ;
Behan, M ;
O'Connell, PR ;
O'Herlihy, C .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2003, 110 (04) :424-429
[12]   DYSFUNCTIONAL LABOR .12. LONG-TERM EFFECTS ON INFANT [J].
FRIEDMAN, EA ;
SACHTLEBEN, MR ;
BRESKY, PA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1977, 127 (07) :779-783
[13]  
FRIEDMAN EA, 1971, J REPROD MED, V6, P20
[14]   The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes [J].
Gardella, C ;
Taylor, M ;
Benedetti, T ;
Hitti, J ;
Critchlow, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (04) :896-902
[15]  
GLEESON NC, 1992, IRISH MED J, V85, P139
[16]   A prospective randomised controlled trial of the Kiwi Omnicup versus conventional ventouse cups for vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery [J].
Groom, KM ;
Jones, BA ;
Miller, N ;
Paterson-Brown, S .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 (02) :183-189
[17]   Obstetric anal sphincter lacerations [J].
Handa, VL ;
Danielsen, BH ;
Gilbert, WM .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 98 (02) :225-230
[18]  
Johanson RB, 2000, COCHRANE DATABASE SY, V11
[19]   A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery [J].
Macleod, M. ;
Strachan, B. ;
Bahl, R. ;
Howarth, L. ;
Goyder, K. ;
Van de Venne, M. ;
Murphy, D. J. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 115 (13) :1688-1694
[20]   A randomised controlled trial of routine versus restrictive use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery: a multicentre pilot study [J].
Murphy, D. J. ;
Macleod, M. ;
Bahl, R. ;
Goyder, K. ;
Howarth, L. ;
Strachan, B. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 115 (13) :1695-1703