The online version of the Dutch Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Factor structure, predictive validity and reliability

被引:20
|
作者
Verkuil, Bart [1 ]
Brosschot, Jos F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Inst Psychol, NL-2300 RB Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Worry; Penn State Worry Questionnaire; Validity; Reliability; Internet administration; Assessment; GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; MODEL; WEB; DEPRESSION; INTERNET; HEALTH; TESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.janxdis.2012.08.002
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) is a widely used self report scale to assess pathological worry. Several studies have shown that the paper-and-pencil version of the PSWQ shows satisfactory psychometric properties. Yet, it is unknown whether the PSWQ is suited to be administered on Internet. As the amount of assessments conducted online is vastly increasing, we examined the factor structure, predictive validity and reliability of the online version of the PSWQ in a large community sample (N = 1025). Confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated that the best fit to the data was provided by a one factor model wherein the reverse-worded items also loaded on a separate method factor. In a second part of the study a self-selected subsample of the total sample (n = 189) kept a log of the frequency and duration of worry episodes for six consecutive days. Worry frequency and worry duration were both predicted by the PSWQ thereby lending support to its predictive validity. These findings provide preliminary evidence that the online version of the PSWQ possesses psychometric properties that are similar to the paper-and-pencil version. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:844 / 848
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factor structure of the Dutch version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire
    van der Heiden, Colin
    Muris, Peter
    Bos, Arjan E. R.
    van der Molen, Henk T.
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 41 (03) : 304 - 309
  • [2] Assessment of hierarchical factor structure, reliability and validity of penn state worry questionnaire turkish version
    Boysan, Murat
    Keskin, Siddik
    Besiroglu, Luetfullah
    KLINIK PSIKOFARMAKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 18 (03): : 174 - 182
  • [3] A norwegian adaptation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Factor structure, reliability, validity and norms
    Pallesen, Stale
    Nordhus, Inger Hilde
    Carlstedt, Berit
    Thayer, Julian F.
    Johnsen, Tom Backer
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 47 (04) : 281 - 291
  • [4] Penn State Worry Questionnaire: structure and psychometric properties of the Chinese version
    Zhong, Jie
    Wang, Chun
    Li, Jie
    Liu, Jun
    JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE B, 2009, 10 (03): : 211 - 218
  • [5] Preliminary Validation of an Ultra-brief Version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire
    Berle, David
    Starcevic, Vladan
    Moses, Karen
    Hannan, Anthony
    Milicevic, Denise
    Sammut, Peter
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2011, 18 (04) : 339 - 346
  • [6] Psychometric Properties and Latent Structure of the Portuguese Version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire
    Castillo, Cristian
    Macrini, Leonardo
    Cheniaux, Elie
    Landeira-Fernandez, Jesus
    SPANISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 13 (01): : 431 - 443
  • [7] Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire in Primary School Children
    Kang, Sung-Goo
    Shin, Jin-Hee
    Song, Sang-Wook
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 25 (08) : 1210 - 1216
  • [8] Screening for Problematic Worry in Adults With a Single Item From the Penn State Worry Questionnaire
    Schroder, Hans S.
    Clark, D. Angus
    Moser, Jason S.
    ASSESSMENT, 2019, 26 (02) : 336 - 346
  • [9] The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Meta-Worry Questionnaire
    Gunduz, Anil
    Gundogmus, Ibrahim
    Engin, Betul
    Baglar, Gonca
    Gunduz, Elvan Basak Usta
    NOROPSIKIYATRI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY, 2022, 59 (03): : 218 - 225