Resistance and cross-resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides and spinosad in the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

被引:195
作者
Mota-Sanchez, D
Hollingworth, RM [1 ]
Grafius, EJ
Moyer, DD
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Entomol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Lond Isl Hort Res & Extens Ctr, Riverhead, NY 11901 USA
关键词
Leptinotarsa decemlineata; neonicotinoids; spinosad; cross-resistance;
D O I
10.1002/ps.1120
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say), has developed resistance to many insecticides used for its control, recently including imidacloprid, a neonicotinoid compound. Other neonicotinoids are now being deployed to control this pest. A key point in the strategies of resistance management is the monitoring of resistance and cross-resistance. In the summer of 2003, imidacloprid-resistant adult Colorado potato beetles collected from Long Island, New York, USA were bioassayed using topical applications of imidacloprid and nine other neonicotinoids. Compared to a standard susceptible strain, the Long Island beetles showed 309-fold resistance to imidacloprid, and lower levels of cross-resistance to all other neonicotinoids, despite these never having been used in the field, i.e., 59-fold to dinotefuran, 33-fold to clothianidin, 29-fold to acetamiprid, 28-fold to N-methylimidacloprid, 25-fold to thiacloprid, 15-fold to thiamethoxam, 10-fold to nitenpyram, but less than 2-fold to nicotine. In injection bioassays, high resistance to imidacloprid was also found (116-fold). Piperonyl butoxide partially suppressed resistance to imidacloprid, but the resistance level was still over 100-fold, indicating that other mechanisms were primarily responsible for resistance. Low levels of resistance (8- to 10-fold) were found to the nicotinic activator, spinosad, in an imidacloprid-resistant strain collected from the same field in 2004. The cross-resistance seen with all the neonicotinoids tested suggests that the rotation of imidacloprid with other neonicotinoids may not be an effective long-term resistance management strategy. Rotation with spinosad also carries some risk, but it is unlikely that spinosad resistance in this case is mechanistically related to that for the neonicotinoids. (c) 2005 Society of Chemical Industry.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 37
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1925, J ECON ENTOMOL
  • [2] ACTIONS OF IMIDACLOPRID AND A RELATED NITROMETHYLENE ON CHOLINERGIC RECEPTORS OF AN IDENTIFIED INSECT MOTOR-NEURON
    BAI, DL
    LUMMIS, SCR
    LEICHT, W
    BREER, H
    SATTELLE, DB
    [J]. PESTICIDE SCIENCE, 1991, 33 (02): : 197 - 204
  • [3] Bishop BA., 1996, CHRYSOMELIDAE BIOL V
  • [4] Boelle J, 1998, PESTIC SCI, V54, P304, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(1998110)54:3<304::AID-PS832>3.0.CO
  • [5] 2-Z
  • [6] Residual activity of imidacloprid controlling Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and three species of potato colonizing aphids (Homoptera: Aphidae)
    Boiteau, G
    Osborn, WPL
    Drew, ME
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 1997, 90 (02) : 309 - 319
  • [7] BYRNE A, 2004, ARTHROPOD MANAGEMENT, V29, pL12
  • [8] Cahill M., 1999, NICOTINOID INSECTICI, P253
  • [9] Casagrande R. A., 1987, Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America, V33, P142
  • [10] DDT resistance in Drosophila correlates with Cyp6g1 over-expression and confers cross-resistance to the neonicotinoid imidacloprid
    Daborn, P
    Boundy, S
    Yen, J
    Pittendrigh, B
    Ffrench-Constant, R
    [J]. MOLECULAR GENETICS AND GENOMICS, 2001, 266 (04) : 556 - 563