Expert Failure: Re-evaluating Research Assessment

被引：13
作者：
Eisen, Jonathan A. [1 ]
MacCallum, Catriona J. [2 ]
Neylon, Cameron [2 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Publ Lib Sci, Cambridge, England
来源：
PLOS BIOLOGY | 2013年 / 11卷 / 10期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1371/journal.pbio.1001677
中图分类号：
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号：
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页数：3
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Allen L, 2013, PROVIDING CONTEXT AR
[2]   Looking for Landmarks: The Role of Expert Review and Bibliometric Analysis in Evaluating Scientific Publication Outputs [J].
Allen, Liz ;
Jones, Ceri ;
Dolby, Kevin ;
Lynn, David ;
Walport, Mark .
PLOS ONE, 2009, 4 (06)
[3]   The impact factor game - It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature [J].
不详 .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2006, 3 (06) :707-708
[4]   Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank [J].
Brembs, Bjoern ;
Button, Katherine ;
Munafo, Marcus .
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7
[5]  
Corbyn Z., 2009, Times Higher Education
[6]  
Dryad, DIG DAT REP
[7]   The Assessment of Science: The Relative Merits of Post-Publication Review, the Impact Factor, and the Number of Citations [J].
Eyre-Walker, Adam ;
Stoletzki, Nina .
PLOS BIOLOGY, 2013, 11 (10)
[8]   Altmetrics: Rethinking the Way We Measure [J].
Galligan, Finbar ;
Dyas-Correia, Sharon .
SERIALS REVIEW, 2013, 39 (01) :56-61
[9]  
Hochberg M, 2012, GOOD SCI DEPENDS GOO
[10]  
ImpactStory, SHAR FULL STOR YOUR
123