On the optimal numerical time integration for DEM using Hertzian force models

被引:8
|
作者
Danby, Matthew [1 ]
Shrimpton, John [1 ]
Palmer, Mark [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Sch Engn Sci, Energy Technol Res Grp, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
[2] GlaxoSmithKline R&D, Inhaled Prod Dev, Ware SG12 0DP, Herts, England
关键词
Discrete element method; Numerical integration; Integration schemes; DISCRETE ELEMENT SIMULATIONS; DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; GRANULAR FLOW; COEFFICIENT; RESTITUTION; PARTICLES; ALGORITHMS; STRESS; CONVECTION; DEPENDENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.compchemeng.2013.06.018
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The numerical accuracy of a selection of different time integration techniques used to solve particle motion is investigated using a normal collision employing the non-linear Hertzian contact force. The findings are compared against the linear force model where it has been found that the expected order of accuracy of higher-order integration schemes is not realised (Tuley et al., 2010). The proposed mechanism for this limitation has been cited as the errors in integration which occur across the force profile discontinuity. By investigating the characteristics of both the non-linear elastic and the non-linear damped Hertzian contact models, it has been found that higher orders of accuracy are recoverable and depends on the degree of the governing non-linear equation. The numerical errors of the linear and non-linear force models are however markedly different in character. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 222
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On the optimal numerical time integration for Lagrangian DEM within implicit flow solvers
    Tuley, Robert
    Danby, Matthew
    Shrimpton, John
    Palmer, Mark
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 34 (06) : 886 - 899
  • [2] Critical time step for DEM simulations of dynamic systems using a Hertzian contact model
    Burns, Shane J.
    Piiroinen, Petri T.
    Hanley, Kevin J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2019, 119 (05) : 432 - 451
  • [3] Numerical comparison of some explicit time integration schemes used in DEM, FEM/DEM and molecular dynamics
    Rougier, E
    Munjiza, A
    John, NWA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2004, 61 (06) : 856 - 879
  • [4] On optimal grid construction in numerical integration
    Wang, S
    Lee, WR
    Teo, KL
    ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 1999, 32 (02) : 177 - 189
  • [5] Optimal Algorithms for Numerical Integration: Recent Results and Open Problems
    Novak, Erich
    MONTE CARLO AND QUASI-MONTE CARLO METHODS, MCQMC 2022, 2024, 460 : 105 - 131
  • [6] Numerical Comparison of Contact Force Models in the Discrete Element Method
    Li, Ziwen
    Zeng, Xiangyuan
    Wen, Tongge
    Zhang, Yonglong
    AEROSPACE, 2022, 9 (11)
  • [7] SEQUENTIALLY OPTIMAL ALGORITHM FOR NUMERICAL-INTEGRATION
    SUKHAREV, AG
    JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1979, 28 (03) : 363 - 373
  • [8] OPTIMAL ALGORITHMS FOR ITERATED NUMERICAL-INTEGRATION
    SUKHAREV, AG
    JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1979, 28 (03) : 375 - 390
  • [9] Comparing numerical integration schemes for time-continuous car-following models
    Treiber, Martin
    Kanagaraj, Venkatesan
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2015, 419 : 183 - 195
  • [10] Comparative behavior of damping terms of viscoelastic contact force models with consideration on relaxation time
    Jian, B.
    Hu, G. M.
    Fang, Z. Q.
    Zhou, H. J.
    Xia, R.
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 356 : 735 - 749