Effects of differences in postprandial glycaemia on cognitive functions in healthy middle-aged subjects

被引:46
作者
Nilsson, A. [1 ]
Radeborg, K. [2 ]
Bjorck, I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Food Technol Engn & Nutr, Div Appl Nutr & Food Chem, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Psychol, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
关键词
breakfast; glucose response; cognitive performance; glucose tolerance; selective attention; working memory; WORKING-MEMORY; GLUCOSE-CONCENTRATION; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; INSULIN-RESISTANCE; DIETARY FIBER; PERFORMANCE; RISK; LOAD; GLUCOREGULATION; DYSFUNCTION;
D O I
10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602900
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Objective: To find useful methods for the studies of cognitive function during a postprandial period, and to use these methods to evaluate function after test meals differing in post meal glycaemia. Subjects/Methods: Forty healthy volunteers aged 49-70 years were studied. A glucose solution (glucose 50 g) was provided through either a bolus or sipping regimen at breakfast to simulate a high-GI or a low-GI breakfast, respectively. Cognitive tests of working memory (WM) were performed at 35, 90, 120 and 150 min after commencing the breakfast, and a test of selective attention (SA) was performed at 170 min. Results: Subjects with higher glucose tolerance performed better in the cognitive tests (P<0.05). After entering glucose tolerance as covariate, the subjects performed better in the working memory test at 90 min (P<0.034) and in the selective attention test at 170 min (P<0.017) after the simulated low-glycaemic index (GI) breakfast compared with the simulated high-GI breakfast. Conclusion: Possibly, the cognitive functions tested were enhanced by avoiding a sharp decline in blood glucose concentration and by maintaining a higher glycaemia in the late postprandial period, respectively. A low-GI diet is preferable in the prevention of the risk of cognitive decline as a result of less efficient glucose regulation.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 120
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[31]   The effect of concurrent task difficulty on working memory during simulated driving [J].
Radeborg, K ;
Briem, V ;
Hedman, LR .
ERGONOMICS, 1999, 42 (05) :767-777
[32]  
Riby L.M., 2004, Brain Impairment, V5, P145, DOI DOI 10.1375/BRIM.5.2.145.58253
[33]  
Ryan CM, 2000, DIABETES-METAB RES, V16, P308, DOI 10.1002/1520-7560(2000)9999:9999<::AID-DMRR141>3.0.CO
[34]  
2-X
[35]   Dietary fiber, glycemic load, and risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women [J].
Salmeron, J ;
Manson, JE ;
Stampfer, MJ ;
Colditz, GA ;
Wing, AL ;
Willett, WC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 (06) :472-477
[36]   Dietary fiber, glycemic load, and risk of NIDDM in men [J].
Salmeron, J ;
Ascherio, A ;
Rimm, EB ;
Colditz, GA ;
Spiegelman, D ;
Jenkins, DJ ;
Stampfer, MJ ;
Wing, AL ;
Willett, WC .
DIABETES CARE, 1997, 20 (04) :545-550
[37]   Blood glucose changes and memory: Effects of manipulating emotionality and mental effort [J].
Scholey, AB ;
Laing, S ;
Kennedy, DO .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 71 (01) :12-19
[38]   Cognitive demand and blood glucose [J].
Scholey, AB ;
Harper, S ;
Kennedy, DO .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2001, 73 (04) :585-592
[39]   Is type II diabetes associated with an increased risk of cognitive dysfunction? A critical review of published studies [J].
Strachan, MWJ ;
Deary, IJ ;
Ewing, FME ;
Frier, BM .
DIABETES CARE, 1997, 20 (03) :438-445