A Comparison of Two Methods in Acquiring Stimulus-Response Curves with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

被引:33
作者
Pearce, Alan J. [1 ]
Clark, Ross A. [2 ]
Kidgell, Dawson J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Sch Psychol, Cognit & Exercise Neurosci Unit, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Physiotherapy, Ctr Hlth Exercise & Sports Med, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[3] Deakin Univ, Ctr Phys Act & Nutr Res, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Stimulus-response curve; Hand; Arm; MOTOR-EVOKED-POTENTIALS; SILENT PERIOD; CORTICOMOTOR EXCITABILITY; CORTICAL EXCITABILITY; RELIABILITY; PROJECTION; MUSCLES; BRAIN; TASK; HAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2012.05.010
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The stimulus-response (S-R) curve is a well accepted constituent in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies. However, it has been suggested that parameters of the S-R curve differ when stimuli are provided in a "ramped" (measured steps from low to high intensity), or "random" fashion. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that there would be no difference in the parameters of the S R curve between either methodologies. Methods: Using a randomised cross-over design, 10 healthy participants (29.6 +/- 6.4 yrs, 3 f) completed "ramped" or "random" curves in biceps brachii (BB) and first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles of both limbs. Curves were compared using mixed-factor ANOVA and correlated between limbs and methodologies. Results: No differences (P > 0.05) and high correlations (range 0.71-0.97; P < 0.001) were observed in BB and FDI data between curves. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that either methodology provides similar parameters of the S - R curve in healthy participants. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 309
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ELECTROENCEPHALOGR C
[2]   Task-specific changes in motor evoked potentials of lower limb muscles after different training interventions [J].
Beck, S. ;
Taube, W. ;
Gruber, M. ;
Amtage, F. ;
Gollhofer, A. ;
Schubert, M. .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 1179 :51-60
[3]   Physiological studies of the corticomotor projection to the hand after subcortical stroke [J].
Byrnes, ML ;
Thickbroom, GW ;
Phillips, BA ;
Wilson, SA ;
Mastaglia, FL .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 110 (03) :487-498
[4]   Reliability of the input-output properties of the cortico-spinal pathway obtained from transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation [J].
Carroll, TJ ;
Riek, S ;
Carson, RG .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2001, 112 (02) :193-202
[5]   Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain [J].
Hallett, M .
NATURE, 2000, 406 (6792) :147-150
[6]   Reliability of motor-evoked potentials during resting and active contraction conditions [J].
Kamen, G .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2004, 36 (09) :1574-1579
[7]  
Kazis DA, 2006, EPILEPTIC DISORD, V8, P136
[8]   NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES AFTER SHORT-TERM STRENGTH TRAINING OF THE BICEPS BRACHII MUSCLE [J].
Kidgell, Dawson J. ;
Stokes, Mark A. ;
Castricum, Troy J. ;
Pearce, Alan J. .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2010, 24 (11) :3123-3132
[9]   Corticospinal properties following short-term strength training of an intrinsic hand muscle [J].
Kidgell, Dawson J. ;
Pearce, Alan J. .
HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, 2010, 29 (05) :631-641
[10]   Silent period to transcranial magnetic stimulation: construction and properties of stimulus-response curves in healthy volunteers [J].
Kimiskidis, VK ;
Papagiannopoulos, S ;
Sotirakoglou, K ;
Kazis, DA ;
Kazis, A ;
Mills, KR .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2005, 163 (01) :21-31