Decontamination of dental implant surfaces by means of photodynamic therapy

被引:83
|
作者
Marotti, Juliana [1 ,5 ]
Tortamano, Pedro [2 ]
Cai, Silvana [3 ]
Ribeiro, Martha Simoes [4 ]
Miranda Franco, Joao Eduardo [2 ]
de Campos, Tomie Toyota [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp RWTH Aachen, Dept Prosthodont & Dent Mat, Fac Med, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Prosthodont, Sch Dent, BR-05508000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Microbiol, Inst Biomed, BR-05508000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Ctr Lasers & Applicat, IPEN CNEN SP, BR-05508000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[5] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Protese, Fac Odontol, BR-05508000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Decontamination; Dental implantation; Lasers; Methylene blue; Photodynamic therapy; Titanium; RECURRENT HERPES LABIALIS; LOW-POWER LASER; PERI-IMPLANTITIS; LETHAL PHOTOSENSITIZATION; BONE REGENERATION; METHYLENE-BLUE; IN-VITRO; BACTERIA; DISEASES; LIGHT;
D O I
10.1007/s10103-012-1148-6
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Several implant surface debridement methods have been reported for the treatment of peri-implantitis, however, some of them can damage the implant surface or promote bacterial resistance. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a new treatment option for peri-implantitis. The aim of this in vitro study was to analyze implant surface decontamination by means of PDT. Sixty implants were equally distributed (n = 10) into four groups and two subgroups. In group G1 there was no decontamination, while in G2 decontamination was performed with chlorhexidine. G3 (PDT -aEuro parts per thousand laser + dye) and G4 (laser, without dye) were divided into two subgroups each; with PDT performed for 3 min in G3a and G4a, and for 5 min in G3b and G4b. After 5 min in contact with methylene blue dye (G3), the implants were irradiated (G3 and G4) with a low-level laser (GaAlAs, 660 nm, 30 mW) for 3 or 5 min (7.2 and 12 J). After the dilutions, culture media were kept in an anaerobic atmosphere for 1 week, and then colony forming units were counted. There was a significant difference (p < 0.001) between G1 and the other groups, and between G4 in comparison with G2 and G3. Better decontamination was obtained in G2 and G3, with no statistically significant difference between them. The results of this study suggest that photodynamic therapy can be considered an efficient method for reducing bacteria on implant surfaces, whereas laser irradiation without dye was less efficient than PDT.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 309
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Decontamination of dental implant surfaces by means of photodynamic therapy
    Juliana Marotti
    Pedro Tortamano
    Silvana Cai
    Martha Simões Ribeiro
    João Eduardo Miranda Franco
    Tomie Toyota de Campos
    Lasers in Medical Science, 2013, 28 : 303 - 309
  • [2] Erratum to: Decontamination of dental implant surfaces by means of photodynamic therapy
    Juliana Marotti
    Pedro Tortamano
    Silvana Cai
    Martha Simões Ribeiro
    João Eduardo Miranda Franco
    Tomie Toyota de Campos
    Lasers in Medical Science, 2013, 28 : 1047 - 1047
  • [3] Decontamination of dental implant surfaces by means of photodynamic therapy (vol 28, pg 303, 2013)
    Marotti, Juliana
    Tortamano, Pedro
    Cai, Silvana
    Ribeiro, Martha Simoes
    Miranda Franco, Joao Eduardo
    de Campos, Tomie Toyota
    LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 28 (03) : 1047 - 1047
  • [4] Photodynamic therapy: alternative in decontamination of surfaces
    Foggiato, A. A.
    Garcez, A. S.
    Fuziy, A.
    Silva, F. D.
    PHOTONIC DIAGNOSIS, MONITORING, PREVENTION, AND TREATMENT OF INFECTIONS AND INFLAMMATORY DISEASES 2020, 2020, 11223
  • [5] Microbial Biofilm Decontamination on Dental Implant Surfaces: A Mini Review
    Dhaliwal, Jagjit Singh
    Abd Rahman, Nurul Adhwa
    Ming, Long Chiau
    Dhaliwal, Sachinjeet Kaur Sodhi
    Knights, Joe
    Albuquerque Junior, Rubens Ferreira
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [6] Antimicrobial efficacy of photodynamic therapy on dental implant surfaces: A systematic review of in vitro studies
    Alasqah, Mohammed N.
    PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY, 2019, 25 : 349 - 353
  • [7] Efficacy of an Er:YAG laser in the decontamination of dental implant surfaces: An in vitro study
    AlMoharib, Hani S.
    Steffensen, Bjorn
    Zoukhri, Driss
    Finkelman, Matthew
    Gyurko, Robert
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2021, 92 (11) : 1613 - 1621
  • [8] Investigation on Laser Dental Implant Decontamination
    Yousif, Ariej
    Zwinger, Stefan
    Beer, Franziska
    Verhagen, Leon
    Wittschier, Manfred
    Strassl, Martin
    Wintner, Ernst
    JOURNAL OF LASER MICRO NANOENGINEERING, 2008, 3 (02): : 119 - 123
  • [9] A Comparative Investigation of Chemical Decontamination Methods for In-Situ Cleaning of Dental Implant Surfaces
    Hussain, Badra
    Khan, Sadia
    Agger, Anne Eriksson
    Ellingsen, Jan Eirik
    Lyngstadaas, Stale Petter
    Bueno, Jaime
    Haugen, Havard J.
    JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL BIOMATERIALS, 2023, 14 (08)
  • [10] Effect of photodynamic therapy potentiated by ultrasonic chamber on decontamination of acrylic and titanium surfaces
    Fernandes, Silva Douglas
    Joao Lopes, Toledo Neto
    Ferreira, Machado Milena
    Ribeiro, Bochnia Jetter
    Silva, Garcez Aguinaldo
    Alberto, Foggiato Augusto
    PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY, 2019, 27 : 345 - 353