Poor prognosis of uterine serous carcinoma compared with grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma in early stage patients

被引:23
作者
Park, Ji Young [1 ]
Nam, Joo-Hyun [2 ]
Kim, Young-Tak [2 ]
Kim, Yong-Man [2 ]
Kim, Jong-Hyeok [2 ]
Kim, Dae-Yeon [2 ]
Sohn, Insuk [3 ]
Lee, Shin-Wha [2 ]
Sung, Chang Ohk [1 ]
Kim, Kyu-Rae [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Samsung Canc Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Endometrial carcinoma; Grade; Serous; Endometrioid; Prognosis; CLEAR-CELL; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s00428-013-1382-8
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Difference in prognosis between grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma (G3EC) of the endometrium and uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is controversial. In this study, we further evaluated the difference in prognosis, if any, between G3EC (n = 61) and USC (n = 47) on a total of 565 patients with endometrial cancer. In addition, meta-analysis was performed using data from seven previous publications (n = 8,637) and from the Asan Medical Center (n = 108). Regarding the cases from our institution, USC tended to occur in older patients (a parts per thousand yen65 years) than G3EC (P = 0.011). Deep myometrial invasion (more than or equal to half) was more frequently identified in G3EC (36/61, 59.0 %) than in USC (17/47, 36.2 %) (P = 0.021). Between patients with early stage G3EC and USC (stages I and II), there were no significant differences in any clinicopathological parameter, but there was a significant difference in overall survival (P = 0.017) that was not found in advanced stage (P = 0.588). USC was an independent prognostic factor for poor overall survival (hazard ratio, 6.125; P = 0.030) in early stage patients. In the meta-analysis on 5-year survival in patients with early stage cancers, which also included our study results, a higher relative risk (1.92, 95 % CI 1.62-2.27) was demonstrated in USC than in G3EC (P < 0.001). In conclusion, our study reveals that USC is associated with a poorer prognosis compared with G3EC, only in patients with early stage carcinoma, suggesting that different treatment strategies should be considered according to the histologic type in order to improve treatment outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 296
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Is there a difference in outcome between stage I-II endometrial cancer of papillary serous/clear cell and endometrioid FIGO Grade 3 cancer? [J].
Alektiar, KM ;
McKee, A ;
Lin, O ;
Venkatraman, E ;
Zelefsky, MJ ;
McKee, B ;
Hoskins, WJ ;
Barakat, RR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 54 (01) :79-85
[2]   High-Grade Endometrial Carcinoma: Serous and Grade 3 Endometrioid Carcinomas Have Different Immunophenotypes and Outcomes [J].
Alkushi, Abdulmohsen ;
Koebel, Martin ;
Kalloger, Steve E. ;
Gilks, C. Blake .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2010, 29 (04) :343-350
[3]   Molecular Profile of Grade 3 Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma: Is it a Type I or Type II Endometrial Carcinoma? [J].
Alvarez, Teresa ;
Miller, Ezra ;
Duska, Linda ;
Oliva, Esther .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2012, 36 (05) :753-761
[4]   Endometrial cancer [J].
Amant, F ;
Moerman, P ;
Neven, P ;
Timmerman, D ;
Van Limbergen, E ;
Vergote, I .
LANCET, 2005, 366 (9484) :491-505
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, WHO CLASSIFICATION T
[6]  
[Anonymous], INT HISTOLOGICCLASSI
[7]   The Molecular Biology of Endometrial Cancers and the Implications for Pathogenesis, Classification, and Targeted Therapies [J].
Bansal, Nisha ;
Yendluri, Vimala ;
Wenham, Robert M. .
CANCER CONTROL, 2009, 16 (01) :8-13
[8]   Endometrial Carcinomas: A Review Emphasizing Overlapping and Distinctive Morphological and Immunohistochemical Features [J].
Bartosch, Carla ;
Lopes, Jose Manuel ;
Oliva, Esther .
ADVANCES IN ANATOMIC PATHOLOGY, 2011, 18 (06) :415-437
[9]   2 PATHOGENETIC TYPES OF ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA [J].
BOKHMAN, JV .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1983, 15 (01) :10-17
[10]   Uterine serous and Grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas - Is there a survival difference? [J].
Boruta, DM ;
Gehrig, PA ;
Groben, PA ;
Bae-Jump, V ;
Boggess, JF ;
Fowler, WC ;
Van Le, L .
CANCER, 2004, 101 (10) :2214-2221