Indexed effective orifice area after mechanical aortic valve replacement does not affect left ventricular mass regression in elderly

被引:14
|
作者
Roscitano, A [1 ]
Benedetto, U [1 ]
Sciangula, A [1 ]
Merico, E [1 ]
Barberi, F [1 ]
Bianchini, R [1 ]
Tonelli, E [1 ]
Sinatra, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Div Cardiac Surg, St Andrea Hosp, I-00181 Rome, Italy
关键词
heart valve; mechanical; aortic valve; replacement; valve disease;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.11.007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: After aortic valve replacement, the effects of a small functional prosthesis on the extent and pattern of regression of Left ventricular hypertrophy and on clinical outcomes may be less significant in older patients with tow cardiac output requirements. The objective of this study was therefore to determine whether patient-prosthesis mismatch affects left ventricular mass regression in the elderly. Methods: The population studied was made up of 88 patients over 65 years of age with pure aortic stenosis who underwent mechanical aortic valve replacement. The effective orifice area index was calculated for each patient on the basis of the projected prosthesis in vivo effective orifice area. It was considered a continuous variable and influence of its entire range of values on the extent of left ventricular mass regression was analyzed in a multivariate prediction model. Results: Even though, in the group with prosthesis-patient mismatch there was a trend for tower postoperative left ventricular mass index (115 +/- 24 g/m(2) VS 102 +/- 27 g/m(2), p = 0.24) and postoperative peak trans-prosthetic gradients (32 +/- 9.8 mmHg vs 28.9 +/- 7.79 mmHg, p = 0.35) these differences were not statistically significant. The prevalence of residual left ventricular hypertrophy at follow-up was 50% in the group with patient-prosthesis mismatch and 50% in the group without patient-prosthesis mismatch (p = 0.83). In multivariate analysis the only factors associated with indexed left ventricular mass were the follow-up time (p = 0.015, r(2) = 0.22) and preoperative indexed Left ventricular mass (p = 0.0012, r(2) = 0.11). Conclusions: The major finding of our study is that patient-prosthesis mismatch does not affect Left ventricular mass regression in patients older than 65 with pure aortic stenosis who underwent mechanical aortic valve replacement. In older patients with tow cardiac output requirements, even a small change in the valve effective orifice area after aortic valve replacement with modern efficient mechanical prosthesis, will result in a marked reduction of pressure gradient and this will be associated with a significant regression of left ventricular mass. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 143
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Left Ventricular Mass Regression is Independent of Gradient Drop and Effective Orifice Area after Aortic Valve Replacement with a Porcine Bioprosthesis
    Sadaba, Justo Rafael
    Herregods, Marie-Christine
    Bogaert, Jan
    Harringer, Wolfgang
    Gerosa, Gino
    JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE, 2012, 21 (06): : 788 - 794
  • [2] Impact of valve size, predicted effective and indexed effective orifice area after aortic valve replacement
    Luthra, Suvitesh
    Malvindi, Pietro G.
    Olevano, Carlo
    Zingale, Anna
    Salem, Hamdi
    Ohri, Sunil K.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2021, 36 (03) : 961 - 968
  • [3] Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement
    Oral, Kerem
    Korkmaz, Askin Ali
    Onan, Burak
    Tamtekin, Burak
    Guden, Mustafa
    Sanisoglu, Ilhan
    ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 10 (05): : 452 - 457
  • [4] Impact of Indexed Effective Orifice Area on the Quality of Life of Patients after Aortic Valve Replacement
    Gursoy, Mete
    Yasar, Emre
    Guler, Salih
    Yalcin, Lokman
    Muradli, Tural
    Kadirogullari, Ersin
    Kutluk, Erhan
    Aydin, Unal
    HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2023, 26 (03): : E249 - E254
  • [5] Left ventricular mass regression early after aortic valve replacement
    Christakis, GT
    Joyner, CD
    Morgan, CD
    Fremes, SE
    Buth, KJ
    Sever, JY
    Rao, V
    Panagiotopoulos, KP
    Murphy, PM
    Goldman, BS
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1996, 62 (04): : 1084 - 1089
  • [6] Left ventricular muscle mass regression after aortic valve replacement
    Lee, JW
    Choi, KJ
    Lee, SG
    Choo, SJ
    Kim, JO
    Kang, DH
    Song, JK
    Song, MG
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 1999, 14 (05) : 511 - 519
  • [7] Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement: Does size really matter?
    Yuh, David D.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 149 (03): : 787 - 788
  • [8] Left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement with mechanical valves
    Singh A.
    Sinha V.K.
    Khandekar J.
    Agrawal N.
    Patwardhan A.
    Kharideparkar J.
    Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2006, 22 (2) : 121 - 125
  • [9] Postoperative Left Ventricular Mass Regression After Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis
    Tomoeda, Hiroshi
    Ueda, Tomohiro
    Teshima, Hideki
    Arinaga, Koichi
    Tayama, Keiichiro
    Fukunaga, Shuji
    Aoyagi, Shigeaki
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2010, 89 (03): : 745 - 750
  • [10] Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with the mosaic bioprosthesis
    Eichinger, WB
    Botzenhardt, F
    Günzinger, R
    Kemkes, BM
    Bleese, N
    Sosnowski, A
    Maïza, D
    Coto, EO
    Bauernschmitt, R
    Lange, R
    JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE, 2002, 11 (04): : 529 - 536