Is it safe to have multiple repeat cesarean sections? A high volume tertiary care center experience

被引:17
作者
Biler, Alper [1 ]
Ekin, Atalay [1 ]
Ozcan, Aykut [1 ]
Inan, Abdurrahman Hamdi [1 ]
Vural, Tayfun [1 ]
Toz, Emrah [1 ]
机构
[1] Tepecik Training & Res Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Gaziler St 468, TR-35120 Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Complication; Morbidity; Multiple repeat cesarean section; MORBIDITY; DELIVERIES; PERCRETA; ACCRETA;
D O I
10.12669/pjms.335.12899
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the obstetric outcomes of cesarean section in women who had a history of four or more previous cesarean sections with those who had a history of two or three previous cesarean sections. Methods: Total 1318 women who underwent repeat cesarean section between January 2013 and January 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 244 (18.5%) had previously had four or more cesarean sections (multiple repeat cesarean section group) and 1074 (81.5%) had previously had two or three cesarean sections (control group). Demographic characteristics and obstetric outcomes were compared using the Independent t and chi-square tests. Results: The adhesion rate (p < 0.001), number of blood transfusion (p = 0.044), operation time (p = 0.012), length of hospital stay (p < 0.001) and tubal ligation surgery (p < 0.001) were significantly higher in multiple repeat cesarean section group compared to control group. Conclusion: Although multiple repeat cesarean section are asscociated with adhesion occurrence, higher number of blood transfusion, increased operation time and length of hospital stay, there is no remarkable difference in serious morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean section.
引用
收藏
页码:1074 / 1079
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1985, Fertil Steril, V43, P351
  • [2] Spontaneous Uterine Rupture due to Placenta Percreta in Second Trimester of Pregnancy: A Case Report
    Biler, Alper
    Ekin, Atalay
    Gezer, Cenk
    Apaydin, Nesin
    Solmaz, Ulas
    Ozeren, Mehmet
    [J]. GAZI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 27 (03): : 171 - +
  • [3] CLARK SL, 1985, OBSTET GYNECOL, V66, P89
  • [4] Multiple repeat caesarean section in the UK: incidence and consequences to mother and child. A national, prospective, cohort study
    Cook, J. R.
    Jarvis, S.
    Knight, M.
    Dhanjal, M. K.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 (01) : 85 - 91
  • [5] Gasim T, 2013, J REPROD MED, V58, P312
  • [6] Outcome after a high number (4-10) of repeated caesarean sections
    Juntunen, K
    Mäkäräinen, L
    Kirkinen, P
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2004, 111 (06) : 561 - 563
  • [7] Kaplanoglu M, 2015, MED SCI MONITOR, V21, P1447, DOI 10.12659/MSM.893333
  • [8] Özcan S, 2015, EUR REV MED PHARMACO, V19, P1959
  • [9] Higher order repeat caesarean sections: how safe are five or more?
    Rashid, M
    Rashid, RS
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2004, 111 (10) : 1090 - 1094
  • [10] Blood transfusion and Cesarean delivery
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    MacPherson, Cora
    Landon, Mark
    Varner, Michael W.
    Leveno, Kenneth J.
    Moawad, Atef H.
    Spong, Catherine Y.
    Caritis, Steve N.
    Meis, Paul J.
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Sorokin, Yoram
    Miodovnik, Menachem
    Carpenter, Marshall
    Peaceman, Alan M.
    O'Sullivan, Mary Jo
    Sibai, Baha M.
    Langer, Oded
    Thorp, John M.
    Ramin, Susan M.
    Mercer, Brian M.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 108 (04) : 891 - 897