Least modification principle for case-based reasoning: a software project planning experience

被引:13
|
作者
Lee, JK
Lee, N
机构
[1] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Grad Sch Management Sci, Seoul 130012, South Korea
[2] Agcy Def Dev, Seoul 138600, South Korea
关键词
software project planning; least modification principle; modification effort estimatiom; case based reasoning; project management;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2005.06.021
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A software project plan is composed of stages of activities and detailed tasks to be performed, and precedence restrictions among them. A project network is very complex and its construction requires a vast amount of field knowledge and experience. To assist the construction of a software project network, we adopt the case-based reasoning approach. However, the software project network may be designed differently depending upon the adopted development methodology and the style of the manager, so full automation of adjusting a past case is almost impossible. Thus, reducing the modification effort to a minimum is very important for enhancing the project planner's performance. In this research, we develop the framework of the Least Modification Principle (LMP) for Case-based Reasoning to solve this kind of problem. LMP is applicable when a reliable estimation of modification effort is possible. To apply the LMP for project network planning, we have selected 17 factors and the values for each factor to specify software projects. The modification effort is estimated based on the syntactic structure of modification rules. The performance of LMP is demonstrated with each of 31 test cases based on the other 30 past cases. We found that the LMP approach can significantly outperform the Ordinary Factor Matching approach. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:190 / 202
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improvisation of case-based reasoning and its application for software fault prediction
    Rashid, Ekbal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SERVICES TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 21 (4-6) : 214 - 227
  • [32] Understanding Similarity: A Joint Project for Psychology, Case-Based Reasoning, and Law
    Ulrike Hahn
    Nick Chater
    Artificial Intelligence Review, 1998, 12 : 393 - 427
  • [33] A hybrid method of blockchain and case-based reasoning for remanufacturing process planning
    Li, Shengqiang
    Zhang, Hua
    Yan, Wei
    Jiang, Zhigang
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2021, 32 (05) : 1389 - 1399
  • [34] Understanding similarity: A joint project for psychology, case-based reasoning, and law
    Hahn, U
    Chater, N
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 1998, 12 (05) : 393 - 427
  • [35] EXAMINING THE FEASIBILITY OF A CASE-BASED REASONING MODEL FOR SOFTWARE EFFORT ESTIMATION
    MUKHOPADHYAY, T
    VICINANZA, SS
    PRIETULA, MJ
    MIS QUARTERLY, 1992, 16 (02) : 155 - 171
  • [36] Investigating soft computing in case-based reasoning for software cost estimation
    Idri, A
    Khoshgoftaar, TM
    Abran, A
    ENGINEERING INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS FOR ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMMUNICATIONS, 2002, 10 (03): : 147 - 157
  • [37] A hybrid method of blockchain and case-based reasoning for remanufacturing process planning
    Shengqiang Li
    Hua Zhang
    Wei Yan
    Zhigang Jiang
    Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2021, 32 : 1389 - 1399
  • [38] Enhanced Planning Of Production Plants: A Case-Based Reasoning Driven Approach
    Syniawa, Daniel
    Egel, Robert
    Schachtsiek, Jan
    Hypki, Alfred
    Kuhlenkoetter, Bernd
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE CONFERENCE ON PRODUCTION SYSTEMS AND LOGISTICS, CPSL 2023-2, 2023, : 506 - 516
  • [39] AN INTRODUCTION TO CASE-BASED REASONING
    KOLODNER, JL
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 1992, 6 (01) : 3 - 34
  • [40] Case-based reasoning: an overview
    deMantaras, RL
    Plaza, E
    AI COMMUNICATIONS, 1997, 10 (01) : 21 - 29