Erythromycin vs metoclopramide for facilitating gastric emptying and tolerance to intragastric nutrition in critically ill patients

被引:77
作者
MacLaren, Robert [1 ]
Kiser, Tyree H. [1 ]
Fish, Douglas N. [1 ]
Wischmeyer, Paul E. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Denver, Sch Pharm, Dept Clin Pharm, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Univ Colorado Denver, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[3] Hlth Sci Ctr, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
关键词
erythromycin; metoclopramide; gastric motility; enteral nutrition; gastric residual; intensive care; critical illness;
D O I
10.1177/0148607108319803
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study is to evaluate erythromycin vs metoclopramide for facilitating gastric emptying and tolerance to intragastric enteral nutrition (EN). Methods: Twenty critically ill patients with a gastric residual >150 mL while receiving EN were randomized to receive 4 intravenous doses of erythromycin 250 mg or metoclopramide 10 mg, each administered every 6 hours. Acetaminophen 975 mg was administered enterally at baseline and after the fourth dose. Acetaminophen peak plasma concentration (Cmax), concentration at 60 minutes (C-60), time to Cmax(Tmax), and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 60 minutes (AUC(0-60)) were determined. Residual volumes and feeding rates were recorded. Results: Compared with baseline, erythromycin increased Cmax (9.5 +/- 6.1 mg/L to 17.7 +/- 11.9 mg/L, P < .01 C-60 (5.4 +/- 3.5 mg/L to 12.9 +/- 7.6 mg/L, P < .01), and AUC(0-60) (3.5 +/- 3.0 mg(.)h/L to 12.5 +/- 8.7 mg(.)h/L, P < .01), while metoclopramide increased only AUC(0-60) (4.4 +/- 2.8 mg(.)h/L to 9.5 +/- 3.8 mg(.)hr/L, P < .05). Neither agent significantly reduced Tmax. Both erythromycin and metoclopramide reduced residual volumes (122 +/- 48 mL to 36 +/- 48 mL, P < .01, and 103 +/- 88 mL to 21 +/- 23 mL, P < .05, respectively) and allowed increased feeding rates (17 +/- 23 mL/h to 45 +/- 21 mL/h, P < .05, and 14 +/- 17 mL/h to 44 +/- 22 mL/h, P < .05, respectively). Conclusions: Both agents facilitate tolerance to intragastric EN, but erythromycin may be more effective than metoclopramide for enhancing gastric motility.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 419
页数:8
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   A study of problems associated with the delivery of enteral feed in critically ill patients in five ICUs in the UK [J].
Adam, S ;
Batson, S .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 23 (03) :261-266
[2]  
American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2005, CARE MED, V171, P388
[3]  
[Anonymous], INTENSIVE CARE ME S3
[4]   Effects of early enteral feeding on the outcome of critically ill mechanically ventilated medical patients [J].
Artinian, V ;
Krayem, H ;
DiGiovine, B .
CHEST, 2006, 129 (04) :960-967
[5]   Erythromycin reduces delayed gastric emptying in critically ill trauma patients: A randomized, controlled trial [J].
Berne, JD ;
Norwood, SH ;
McAuley, CE ;
Vallina, VL ;
Villareal, D ;
Weston, J ;
McClarty, J .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2002, 53 (03) :422-425
[6]   Daily enteral feeding practice on the ICU: attainment of goals and interfering factors [J].
Binnekade, JM ;
Tepaske, R ;
Bruynzeel, P ;
Mathus-Vliegen, EMH ;
de Hann, RJ .
CRITICAL CARE, 2005, 9 (03) :R218-R225
[7]   Gastrointestinal promotility drugs in the critical care setting: A systematic review of the evidence [J].
Booth, CM ;
Heyland, DK ;
Paterson, WG .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 30 (07) :1429-1435
[8]  
Calcroft RM., 1997, INTENS CARE MED S, V23
[9]   GASTROINTESTINAL DYSFUNCTION AMONG INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT PATIENTS [J].
CHANG, RWS ;
JACOBS, S ;
LEE, B .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1987, 15 (10) :909-914
[10]   Gastrointestinal motility and prokinetics in the critically ill [J].
Chapman, Marianne J. ;
Nguyen, Nam Q. ;
Fraser, Robert J. L. .
CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2007, 13 (02) :187-194