Factors Increasing Snake Detection and Perceived Threat in Captive Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta)

被引:13
作者
Etting, Stephanie F. [1 ]
Isbell, Lynne A. [1 ,2 ]
Grote, Mark N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Anthropol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Grad Grp Anim Behav, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
anti-predator behavior; mobbing; snakes; primates; Hidden Markov Model; MARMOSETS CALLITHRIX-GEOFFROYI; EAGLES STEPHANOAETUS-CORONATUS; CEBUS-APELLA-NIGRITUS; VARIABLE ALARM CALLS; STATE-TRAIT ANALYSIS; ANTIPREDATOR BEHAVIOR; CAPUCHIN MONKEYS; TARSIUS-SPECTRUM; BOA-CONSTRICTOR; CROWNED EAGLES;
D O I
10.1002/ajp.22216
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
The primary predators of primates are all ambush hunters, and yet felids, raptors, and snakes differ in aspects of their ecology that affect the evasive strategies of their primate prey. Felids and raptors can traverse long distances quickly, thus the urgency of threat they present increases as they come closer in proximity to primates. In contrast, snakes do not move rapidly over long distances, and so primates may be reasonably safe even at close distances provided snakes can be detected and monitored. We investigated the ability of captive rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) to detect snakes at distances ranging from 15 to 1.5m. We also examined variation in intensity of perceived threat by applying a Hidden Markov Model to infer changes in underlying state from observable behaviors, that is, increased attention and mobbing. We found that the macaques often failed to detect snake models but that closer proximity improved snake detection, which is necessary before threat can be perceived. We also found that having only one individual in fairly close proximity (7.5m) was sufficient to alert the rest of the group and so the chances of detection did not increase with increasing group size. Finally, we found that when the snakes were perceived, they did not elicit greater intensity of response with closer proximity. These results provide evidence that the threat from snakes is greatest when they are in proximity to primates but are unseen. When snakes are seen, however, distance appears not to affect primates' perceived risk, in contrast to their perceived risk from raptors and felids. Am. J. Primatol. 76:135-145, 2014. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 145
页数:11
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
Alexander R.D., 1974, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V5, P325, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001545
[2]   The primate amygdala and the neurobiology of social behavior: Implications for understanding social anxiety [J].
Amaral, DG .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 51 (01) :11-17
[3]   PREDATION AND PRIMATE EVOLUTION [J].
ANDERSON, CM .
PRIMATES, 1986, 27 (01) :15-39
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1990, MONKEYS SEE WORLD IN, DOI DOI 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226218526.001.0001
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical informationtheoretic approach
[6]   Variation in behavioral and hormonal responses of adult male gray-cheeked mangabeys (Lophocebus albigena) to crowned eagles (Stephanoaetus coronatus) in Kibale National Park, Uganda [J].
Arlet, Malgorzata E. ;
Isbell, Lynne A. .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2009, 63 (04) :491-499
[7]   Reactions to potential predators in captive-born marmosets (Callithrix penicillata) [J].
Barros, M ;
Boere, V ;
Mello, EL ;
Tomaz, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 2002, 23 (02) :443-454
[8]   Alarm calling in yellow-bellied marmots .1. The meaning of situationally variable alarm calls [J].
Blumstein, DT ;
Armitage, KB .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1997, 53 :143-171
[9]   Are vigilance, risk from avian predators and group size consequences of habitat structure? A comparison of three species of squirrel monkey (Saimiri oerstedii, S. boliviensis, and S. sciureus) [J].
Boinski, S ;
Kauffman, L ;
Westoll, A ;
Stickler, CM ;
Cropp, S ;
Ehmke, E .
BEHAVIOUR, 2003, 140 :1421-1467
[10]   Polyboroides radiatus predation attempts on Propithecus verreauxi [J].
Brockman, DK .
FOLIA PRIMATOLOGICA, 2003, 74 (02) :71-74