The effect of electrical stimulation on corticospinal excitability is dependent on application duration: a same subject pre-post test design

被引:33
作者
Andrews, Rebecca K. [1 ,2 ]
Schabrun, Siobhan M. [1 ,2 ]
Ridding, Michael C. [3 ]
Galea, Mary P. [4 ]
Hodges, Paul W. [1 ,2 ]
Chipchase, Lucinda S. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, NHMRC Ctr Clin Res Excellence Spinal Pain Injury, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Sch Paediat & Reprod Hlth, Robinson Inst, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Rehabil Sci Res Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[5] Univ Western Sydney, Sch Sci & Hlth, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Electrical stimulation therapy; Homeostatic plasticity; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Physical therapy modalities; Rehabilitation; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; PERIPHERAL-NERVE STIMULATION; COMMON PERONEAL NERVE; EVOKED POTENTIALS; CORTICAL PLASTICITY; SKELETAL-MUSCLE; TIME-COURSE; HUMANS; MODULATION;
D O I
10.1186/1743-0003-10-51
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background: In humans, corticospinal excitability is known to increase following motor electrical stimulation (ES) designed to mimic a voluntary contraction. However, whether the effect is equivalent with different application durations and whether similar effects are apparent for short and long applications is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the duration of peripheral motor ES influenced its effect on corticospinal excitability. Methods: The excitability of the corticomotor pathway to abductor pollicis brevis (APB) was measured in fourteen health subjects using transcranial magnetic stimulation before, immediately after and 10 minutes after three different durations (20-, 40-, 60-min) of motor ES (30Hz, ramped). This intervention was designed to mimic a voluntary contraction in APB. To control for effects of motor ES on the peripheral elements (muscle fibre, membrane, neuromuscular junction), maximum compound muscle actions potentials (M-waves) were also recorded at each time point. Results were analysed using a repeated measures analysis of variance. Results: Peripheral excitability was reduced following all three motor ES interventions. Conversely, corticospinal excitability was increased immediately following 20- and 40-min applications of motor ES and this increase was maintained at least 20-min following the intervention. A 60-min application of motor ES did not alter corticospinal excitability. Conclusions: A 20-min application of motor ES that is designed to mimic voluntary muscle contraction is as effective as that applied for 40-min when the aim of the intervention is to increase corticospinal excitability. Longer motor ES durations of 60-min do not influence corticospinal excitability, possibly as a result of homeostatic plasticity mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 54 条
[41]   Changes in corticomotor representations induced by prolonged peripheral nerve stimulation in humans [J].
Ridding, MC ;
McKay, DR ;
Thompson, PD ;
Miles, TS .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (08) :1461-1469
[42]   INFLUENCE OF ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OF THE TIBIALIS ANTERIOR MUSCLE IN PARAPLEGIC SUBJECTS .2. MORPHOLOGICAL AND HISTOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES [J].
ROCHESTER, L ;
BARRON, MJ ;
CHANDLER, CS ;
SUTTON, RA ;
MILLER, S ;
JOHNSON, MA .
PARAPLEGIA, 1995, 33 (09) :514-522
[43]   Differential modulation of motor cortical plasticity and excitability in early and late phases of human motor learning [J].
Rosenkranz, Karin ;
Kacar, Aleksandra ;
Rothwell, John C. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 27 (44) :12058-12066
[44]   Functional electrical stimulation and rehabilitation - an hypothesis [J].
Rushton, DN .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2003, 25 (01) :75-78
[45]   The influence of correlated afferent input on motor cortical representations in humans [J].
Schabrun, S. M. ;
Ridding, M. C. .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 183 (01) :41-49
[46]   Interaction Between Simultaneously Applied Neuromodulatory Interventions in Humans [J].
Schabrun, Siobhan M. ;
Chipchase, Lucinda S. ;
Zipf, Natasha ;
Thickbroom, Gary W. ;
Hodges, Paul W. .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2013, 6 (04) :624-630
[47]   Long-Lasting Contralateral Motor Cortex Excitability Is Increased by Unilateral Hand Movement That Triggers Electrical Stimulation of Opposite Homologous Muscles [J].
Schmidt, Matthew W. ;
Hinder, Mark R. ;
Summers, Jeffery J. ;
Garry, Michael I. .
NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2011, 25 (06) :521-530
[48]   Modulation of associative human motor cortical plasticity by attention [J].
Stefan, K ;
Wycislo, M ;
Classen, J .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 92 (01) :66-72
[49]   Functional electrical stimulation in neurological disorders [J].
Sujith, O. K. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2008, 15 (05) :437-444
[50]   Altered responses of human elbow flexors to peripheral-nerve and cortical stimulation during a sustained maximal voluntary contraction [J].
Taylor, JL ;
Butler, JE ;
Gandevia, SC .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1999, 127 (01) :108-115