The effect of electrical stimulation on corticospinal excitability is dependent on application duration: a same subject pre-post test design

被引:33
作者
Andrews, Rebecca K. [1 ,2 ]
Schabrun, Siobhan M. [1 ,2 ]
Ridding, Michael C. [3 ]
Galea, Mary P. [4 ]
Hodges, Paul W. [1 ,2 ]
Chipchase, Lucinda S. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, NHMRC Ctr Clin Res Excellence Spinal Pain Injury, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Sch Paediat & Reprod Hlth, Robinson Inst, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Rehabil Sci Res Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[5] Univ Western Sydney, Sch Sci & Hlth, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Electrical stimulation therapy; Homeostatic plasticity; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Physical therapy modalities; Rehabilitation; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; PERIPHERAL-NERVE STIMULATION; COMMON PERONEAL NERVE; EVOKED POTENTIALS; CORTICAL PLASTICITY; SKELETAL-MUSCLE; TIME-COURSE; HUMANS; MODULATION;
D O I
10.1186/1743-0003-10-51
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background: In humans, corticospinal excitability is known to increase following motor electrical stimulation (ES) designed to mimic a voluntary contraction. However, whether the effect is equivalent with different application durations and whether similar effects are apparent for short and long applications is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the duration of peripheral motor ES influenced its effect on corticospinal excitability. Methods: The excitability of the corticomotor pathway to abductor pollicis brevis (APB) was measured in fourteen health subjects using transcranial magnetic stimulation before, immediately after and 10 minutes after three different durations (20-, 40-, 60-min) of motor ES (30Hz, ramped). This intervention was designed to mimic a voluntary contraction in APB. To control for effects of motor ES on the peripheral elements (muscle fibre, membrane, neuromuscular junction), maximum compound muscle actions potentials (M-waves) were also recorded at each time point. Results were analysed using a repeated measures analysis of variance. Results: Peripheral excitability was reduced following all three motor ES interventions. Conversely, corticospinal excitability was increased immediately following 20- and 40-min applications of motor ES and this increase was maintained at least 20-min following the intervention. A 60-min application of motor ES did not alter corticospinal excitability. Conclusions: A 20-min application of motor ES that is designed to mimic voluntary muscle contraction is as effective as that applied for 40-min when the aim of the intervention is to increase corticospinal excitability. Longer motor ES durations of 60-min do not influence corticospinal excitability, possibly as a result of homeostatic plasticity mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Synaptic plasticity: taming the beast [J].
Abbott, L. F. ;
Nelson, Sacha B. .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 3 (11) :1178-1183
[2]   Cortical excitability changes following grasping exercise augmented with electrical stimulation [J].
Barsi, Gergely I. ;
Popovic, Dejan B. ;
Tarkka, Ina M. ;
Sinkjaer, Thomas ;
Grey, Michael J. .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2008, 191 (01) :57-66
[3]  
Belanger A.Y., 2010, Therapeutic electrophysical agents: Evidence behind practice
[4]   Sustained attention modulates the immediate effect of de-afferentation on the cortical representation of the digits:: source localization of somatosensory evoked potentials in humans [J].
Buchner, H ;
Reinartz, U ;
Waberski, TD ;
Gobbelé, R ;
Noppeney, U ;
Scherg, M .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1999, 260 (01) :57-60
[5]   Prolonged peripheral nerve stimulation induces persistent changes in excitability of human motor cortex [J].
Charlton, CS ;
Ridding, MC ;
Thompson, PD ;
Miles, TS .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 208 (1-2) :79-85
[6]   Nervous system reorganization following injury [J].
Chen, R ;
Cohen, LG ;
Hallett, M .
NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 111 (04) :761-773
[7]   Functional electrical stimulation exercise increases GLUT-1 and GLUT-4 in paralyzed skeletal muscle [J].
Chilibeck, PD ;
Bell, G ;
Jeon, J ;
Weiss, CB ;
Murdoch, G ;
MacLean, I ;
Ryan, E ;
Burnham, R .
METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1999, 48 (11) :1409-1413
[8]   A checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation to study the motor system: An international consensus study [J].
Chipchase, Lucy ;
Schabrun, Siobhan ;
Cohen, Leonardo ;
Hodges, Paul ;
Ridding, Michael ;
Rothwell, John ;
Taylor, Janet ;
Ziemann, Ulf .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 123 (09) :1698-1704
[9]   Corticospinal Excitability is Dependent on the Parameters of Peripheral Electric Stimulation: A Preliminary Study [J].
Chipchase, Lucy S. ;
Schabrun, Siobhan M. ;
Hodges, Paul W. .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 92 (09) :1423-1430
[10]   Effects of attention on inhibitory and facilitatory phenomena elicited by paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects [J].
Conte, Antonella ;
Belvisi, Daniele ;
Iezzi, Ennio ;
Mari, Francesco ;
Inghilleri, Maurizio ;
Berardelli, Alfredo .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2008, 186 (03) :393-399