Making pore choices: repeated regime shifts in stomatal ratio

被引:75
作者
Muir, Christopher D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Biodivers Res Ctr, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Bot, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
selective regime; adaptive landscape; phenotypic constraint; stomata; amphistomy; phylogenetic comparative methods; QUANTITATIVE GENETIC-ANALYSIS; STABILIZING SELECTION; ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE; PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION; NATURAL-SELECTION; LEAVES; CO2; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; TRAITS; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1098/rspb.2015.1498
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Ecologically important traits do not evolve without limits. Instead, evolution is constrained by the set of available and viable phenotypes. In particular, natural selection may only favour a narrow range of adaptive optima constrained within selective regimes. Here, I integrate data with theory to test whether selection explains phenotypic constraint. A global database of 599 plant species from 94 families shows that stomatal ratio, a trait affecting photosynthesis and defence against pathogens, is highly constrained. Most plants have their stomata on the lower leaf surface (hypostomy), but species with half their stomata on each surface (amphistomy) form a distinct mode in the trait distribution. A model based on a trade-off between maximizing photosynthesis and a fitness cost of upper stomata predicts a limited number of adaptive solutions, leading to a multimodal trait distribution. Phylogenetic comparisons show that amphistomy is the most common among fast-growing species, supporting the view that CO2 diffusion is under strong selection. These results indicate that selective optima stay within a relatively stable set of selective regimes over macroevolutionary time.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1928, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B, DOI DOI 10.1098/RSTB.1928.0001
[2]  
[Anonymous], TEMPO AND MODE IN EV
[3]   CONSTRAINTS ON PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION [J].
ARNOLD, SJ .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1992, 140 :S85-S107
[4]   Phenotypic Evolution: The Ongoing Synthesis [J].
Arnold, Stevan J. .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2014, 183 (06) :729-746
[5]  
Barton N, 2000, BIOESSAYS, V22, P1075, DOI 10.1002/1521-1878(200012)22:12<1075::AID-BIES5>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-M
[7]   ADAPTATION REVIEWED - A PHYLOGENETIC METHODOLOGY FOR STUDYING CHARACTER MACROEVOLUTION [J].
BAUM, DA ;
LARSON, A .
SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1991, 40 (01) :1-18
[8]   MODELING STABILIZING SELECTION: EXPANDING THE ORNSTEIN-UHLENBECK MODEL OF ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION [J].
Beaulieu, Jeremy M. ;
Jhwueng, Dwueng-Chwuan ;
Boettiger, Carl ;
O'Meara, Brian C. .
EVOLUTION, 2012, 66 (08) :2369-2383
[9]   Unified changes in cell size permit coordinated leaf evolution [J].
Brodribb, Tim J. ;
Jordan, Greg J. ;
Carpenter, Raymond J. .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2013, 199 (02) :559-570
[10]   Phylogenetic comparative analysis: A modeling approach for adaptive evolution [J].
Butler, MA ;
King, AA .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2004, 164 (06) :683-695