The quiet and controversial: Ural family of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

The absence of lateral gene exchange is a characteristic feature defining the genome evolution and clonal population structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Certain of its lineages have justly attracted more attention due to their global dissemination and/or remarkable pathogenic properties. In this critical review, I discuss the population structure and genetic geography of the less 'popular' but in some aspects no less noteworthy M. tuberculosis lineage, Ural family. Its specific signature was initially defined by single copy in MIRU26, and large (>6) copy number in MIRU10 loci, and by 43-spoligotyping as absence of signals 29-31 and 33-36. Here, I suggest to subdivide Ural strains with present and absent spoligosignal 2 into primary Ural-1 and secondary Ural-2 sublineages, respectively, while 1 copy in MIRU26 is specific of Ural-1. Furthermore, three copies were recently described in MIRU10 in Ural-1 strains which highlights a high diversity of this locus in Ural genotype. The data on the two Ural sublineages were extracted from SpolDB4 database and original publications in order to trace their distribution at global and within-country levels. Importantly, the rigorous reanalysis suggested the true rate of the Ural genotype in the Ural area in Russia to be only 7%. In contrast, the frequencies of the Ural sublineages peak elsewhere: in South Ukraine and Georgia/Abkhazia (Ural-1, up to 14-19%), and in southwestern Iran (Ural-2, up to 26%). However, as this name is used since 2005, it seems most parsimonious to continue its use even if misleading. The forest graph was built on the available spoligoprofiles of Ural family strains from Eurasia. It helped to suggest routes of their primary dispersal that are discussed in the context of the known human migrations also influenced by natural barriers. The north/east Pontic area may have been an area of origin and primary dispersal of the Ural (Ural-1) genotype in Eurasia, whereas political and natural borders may have influenced its subsequent dissemination throughout Central Asia. Studies of phenotypic properties in different models, comparison with host genetics give evidence that the Ural family strains are not associated with increased capacity to acquire drug resistance, pathogenicity or transmissibility. Instead since Ural family is rather moderately widespread in Eurasia beyond the hypothesized areas of origin, this situation may be a result of its low contagiosity as a consequence of long-term co-adaptation with human host. Future research should be focused on whole-genome sequencing in order to identify Ural-specific SNP and/or deletion, to resolve its phylogenetic and phylogeographic uncertainty and to elucidate biological features underlying its circulation and co-evolution with the human species. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.