The impact of different agricultural land-uses on epigeal spider diversity in Scotland

被引:48
作者
Downie, I. S. [1 ]
Wilson, W. L. [2 ]
Abernethy, V. J. [2 ]
McCracken, D. I. [1 ]
Foster, G. N. [1 ]
Ribera, I. [1 ]
Murphy, K. J. [2 ]
Waterhouse, A.
机构
[1] Scottish Agr Coll, Environm Div, Auchincruive KA6 5HW, Ayr, Scotland
[2] Univ Glasgow, Inst Biomed & Life Sci, Div Environm & Evolutionary Biol, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
spiders; agriculture; land-use; modelling; diversity; Scotland;
D O I
10.1023/A:1009649222102
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Detailed knowledge of the biodiversity of spider communities on agricultural land is important both in terms of enhancing pest control and understanding the driving forces influencing nature conservation value. Pitfall traps were used to assess spider species diversity at 71 Scottish agricultural sites between May and September during 1996 and 1997. Land-use varied from intensive arable fields, grasslands and extensive heather (Calluna vulgaris) moorland. Spider species richness (S) was found to decrease significantly as farm management intensity increased. Several linear regression models based on the 1996 data (50 sites) and a selection of plant, soil and landscape variables explained up to 88% of the variation in species richness. Four of these models were used to estimate 1997 species richness (36 sites: 15 repeat and 21 new) and up to 58% of sites were correctly predicted to within +/- four species of the actual number caught. As only 60% of the repeat 1997 sites had values of S within four units of their 1996 score, this suggested a relatively high level of model accuracy. Model accuracy increased to 64% when all four models were used for each site, suggesting the individual models should be targeted at specific land-use types. We discuss the relevance of these models for predicting the consequences of changes in agricultural land-use for spider diversity.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 286
页数:14
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Abernethy V.J., 1996, P51
[2]  
Bommarco R, 1998, ECOL APPL, V8, P846, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0846:RAEROA]2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]   Comparative biodiversity along a gradient of agricultural landscapes [J].
Burel, F ;
Baudry, J ;
Butet, A ;
Clergeau, P ;
Delettre, Y ;
Le Coeur, D ;
Dubs, F ;
Morvan, N ;
Paillat, G ;
Petit, S ;
Thenail, C ;
Brunel, E ;
Lefeuvre, JC .
ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1998, 19 (01) :47-60
[5]   A FOOD-WEB APPROACH TO EVALUATING THE EFFECT OF INSECTICIDE SPRAYING ON INSECT PEST POPULATION-DYNAMICS IN A PHILIPPINE IRRIGATED RICE ECOSYSTEM [J].
COHEN, JE ;
SCHOENLY, K ;
HEONG, KL ;
JUSTO, H ;
ARIDA, G ;
BARRION, AT ;
LITSINGER, JA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1994, 31 (04) :747-763
[6]   A conceptual model of land conversion processes: predictions and evidence from a microlandscape experiment with grassland insects [J].
Collinge, SK ;
Forman, RTT .
OIKOS, 1998, 82 (01) :66-84
[7]  
Dennis P, 1998, KEY CONCEPTS IN LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, P161
[8]  
Dickinson G., 1998, ECOSYSTEMS FUNCTIONA
[9]  
Downie Iain S., 1998, P311
[10]   In search of the best correlates for local organismal biodiversity in cultivated areas [J].
Duelli, P ;
Obrist, MK .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 1998, 7 (03) :297-309