Focusing on the "Person" in Personalized Medicine: The Future of Patient-Centered Care in Radiation Oncology

被引:18
作者
Berman, Abigail T. [1 ]
Rosenthal, Seth A. [2 ,3 ]
Moghanaki, Drew [4 ]
Woodhouse, Kristina D. [1 ]
Movsas, Benjamin [5 ]
Vapiwala, Neha [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Sutter Med Grp, Sacramento, CA USA
[3] Sutter Canc Ctr, Sacramento, CA USA
[4] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Richmond, VA USA
[5] Henry Ford Hosp, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
关键词
Radiation oncology; shared decision making; personalized care; decision aid; quality of life; patient-reported outcomes; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SHARED DECISION-MAKING; STEREOTACTIC ABLATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; COMMON TERMINOLOGY CRITERIA; CELL LUNG-CANCER; REPORTED OUTCOMES; THERAPY; INTERVENTIONS; COMMUNICATION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacr.2016.09.012
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Numerous efforts in radiation oncology aim to improve the value of clinical care. To evaluate the success of these efforts, outcome measures must be well defined and incorporate the beliefs of the patients they affect. These outcomes have historically centered on rates of tumor control, overall survival, and adverse events as perceived and reported by providers. However, the future of patient-centered care in radiation oncology is increasingly focusing on the "person" in the population and the individual in the studies to more closely reflect the ideals of personalized medicine. Formally known as patient-centered outcomes, this metric encompasses parameters of patient satisfaction, engagement, and treatment compliance. Evaluations that investigate the safety and efficacy of treatments are increasingly soliciting participation from patients within a model of shared decision making that improves patients' knowledge, satisfaction, physical and emotional well-being, and trust in providers. Modern clinical trials that embrace this approach may even focus on patient-reported outcomes as the primary end point, as opposed to time-honored physician-reported events. The authors explore the growing role of patient-centered care, the incorporation of shared decision making, and the relevant body of existing and developing literature on this topic in radiation oncology. The authors report recent discoveries from this area of study and describe how they can not only support high-quality, high-value patient care but also enhance recruitment to clinical oncology trials, both of which are challenging to achieve in today's relatively resource-strapped environment.
引用
收藏
页码:1571 / 1578
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Shared decision making in dermato-oncology: preference for involvement of melanoma patients [J].
Albrecht, Karoline J. ;
Nashan, Dorothee ;
Meiss, Frank ;
Bengel, Juergen ;
Reuter, Katrin .
MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2014, 24 (01) :68-74
[2]  
[Anonymous], PROST ADV RAD TECHN
[3]   Patient-Centered Cancer Treatment Planning: Improving the Quality of Oncology Care. Summary of an Institute of Medicine Workshop [J].
Balogh, Erin P. ;
Ganz, Patricia A. ;
Murphy, Sharon B. ;
Nass, Sharyl J. ;
Ferrell, Betty R. ;
Stovall, Ellen .
ONCOLOGIST, 2011, 16 (12) :1800-1805
[4]   Development of the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) [J].
Basch, Ethan ;
Reeve, Bryce B. ;
Mitchell, Sandra A. ;
Clauser, Steven B. ;
Minasian, Lori M. ;
Dueck, Amylou C. ;
Mendoza, Tito R. ;
Hay, Jennifer ;
Atkinson, Thomas M. ;
Abernethy, Amy P. ;
Bruner, Deborah W. ;
Cleeland, Charles S. ;
Sloan, Jeff A. ;
Chilukuri, Ram ;
Baumgartner, Paul ;
Denicoff, Andrea ;
St Germain, Diane ;
O'Mara, Ann M. ;
Chen, Alice ;
Kelaghan, Joseph ;
Bennett, Antonia V. ;
Sit, Laura ;
Rogak, Lauren ;
Barz, Allison ;
Paul, Diane B. ;
Schrag, Deborah .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2014, 106 (09)
[5]   Recommendations for Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes Into Clinical Comparative Effectiveness Research in Adult Oncology [J].
Basch, Ethan ;
Abernethy, Amy P. ;
Mullins, C. Daniel ;
Reeve, Bryce B. ;
Smith, Mary Lou ;
Coons, Stephen Joel ;
Sloan, Jeff ;
Wenzel, Keith ;
Chauhan, Cynthia ;
Eppard, Wayland ;
Frank, Elizabeth S. ;
Lipscomb, Joseph ;
Raymond, Stephen A. ;
Spencer, Merianne ;
Tunis, Sean .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (34) :4249-4255
[6]   Physicians' Awareness and Attitudes Toward Decision Aids for Patients With Cancer [J].
Brace, Chantalle ;
Schmocker, Selina ;
Huang, Harden ;
Victor, J. Charles ;
McLeod, Robin S. ;
Kennedy, Erin D. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (13) :2286-2292
[7]   Testing the utility of a cancer clinical trial specific Question Prompt List (QPL-CT) during oncology consultations [J].
Brown, Richard F. ;
Bylund, Carma L. ;
Li, Yuelin ;
Edgerson, Shawna ;
Butow, Phyllis .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2012, 88 (02) :311-317
[8]   Sharing decisions in breast cancer care: Development of the Decision Analysis System for Oncology (DAS-O) to identify shared decision making during treatment consultations [J].
Brown, Richard F. ;
Butow, Phyllis N. ;
Juraskova, Ilona ;
Ribi, Karin ;
Gerber, Daniela ;
Bernhard, Jurg ;
Tattersall, Martin H. N. .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2011, 14 (01) :29-37
[9]   How do interventions designed to improve provider-patient communication work? Illustrative applications of a framework for communication [J].
Brundage, Michael D. ;
Feldman-Stewart, Deb ;
Tishelman, Carol .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2010, 49 (02) :136-143
[10]   Stakeholder perspectives on implementing the National Cancer Institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) [J].
Bruner, Deborah Watkins ;
Hanisch, Laura J. ;
Reeve, Bryce B. ;
Trotti, Andy M. ;
Schrag, Deborah ;
Sit, Laura ;
Mendoza, Tito R. ;
Minasian, Lori ;
O'Mara, Ann ;
Denicoff, Andrea M. ;
Rowland, Julia H. ;
Montello, Michael ;
Geoghegan, Cindy ;
Abernethy, Amy P. ;
Clauser, Steven B. ;
Castro, Kathleen ;
Mitchell, Sandra A. ;
Burke, Laurie ;
Trentacosti, Ann Marie ;
Basch, Ethan M. .
TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2011, 1 (01) :110-122