Is ecosystem restoration worth the effort? The rehabilitation of a Finnish river affects recreational ecosystem services

被引:31
作者
Polizzi, Cecilia [1 ]
Simonetto, Matteo [1 ]
Barausse, Alberto [1 ]
Chaniotou, Ninetta [2 ]
Kankanen, Riina [3 ]
Keranen, Silja [2 ]
Manzardo, Alessandro [1 ]
Mustajarvi, Kaisa [3 ]
Palmeri, Luca [1 ]
Scipioni, Antonio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Ind Engn, I-35131 Padua, Italy
[2] Kainuun Eta Oy, Kajaani 87100, Finland
[3] Ramboll Finland, FI-02601 Espoo, Finland
关键词
Ecosystem services; Marginal change; Willingness to pay; River rehabilitation; Sustainability; CONTINGENT VALUATION; FRAMEWORK; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.001
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The need to assess the societal consequences of human actions impacting the environment has led to the concept of "ecosystem services" (ESS), which can be valued in socio-economic terms to communicate the ecologically-based costs and benefits of management choices. Quantifying the usually-neglected value of ESS should lead to better awareness of the societal importance of ecosystems and more balanced decision-making. We examine the case of the rehabilitation project of the River Pajakkajoki (Finland), aiming to improve conditions for fish spawning and increase the recreational attractiveness of natural areas along the river. We investigated how the rehabilitation changed ESS provision and the value of such change, focusing on recreational E55 due to data availability. We conducted an economic valuation of recreational [SS based on questionnaires administered to both locals and non-locals, analyzed by combining revealed and stated preference methods. We show that the rehabilitation generated great benefits: the estimated increase in recreational [SS value was 40D-144.7 /personlyear. with slight differences between residents and non-residents. When scaling up this value to all the visitors of the area, the benefits of river restoration were estimated to compensate for the project costs in approximately 3-10 years. justifying investments in restoration from a societal perspective. (C) 2015 Elsevier By. All rights reserved,
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 169
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   COMBINING REVEALED AND STATED PREFERENCE METHODS FOR VALUING ENVIRONMENTAL AMENITIES [J].
ADAMOWICZ, W ;
LOUVIERE, J ;
WILLIAMS, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1994, 26 (03) :271-292
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, EC IMPACT GAME COARS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations
[4]  
Appelblad H., 2001, SPAWNING SALMON RESO
[5]  
Arrow K., 1993, Federal Register
[6]   Learning design contingent valuation (LDCV): NOAA guidelines, preference learning and coherent arbitrariness [J].
Bateman, Ian J. ;
Burgess, Diane ;
Hutchinson, W. George ;
Matthews, David I. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 55 (02) :127-141
[7]   Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments [J].
Bateman, Ian J. ;
Mace, Georgina M. ;
Fezzi, Carlo ;
Atkinson, Giles ;
Turner, Kerry .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2011, 48 (02) :177-218
[8]  
Birol E., 2006, 156 US IFPRIEPT
[9]   Evaluating an ecosystem service provided by Atlantic salmon, sea trout and other fish species in the River Spey, Scotland: The economic impact of recreational rod fisheries [J].
Butler, J. R. A. ;
Radford, A. ;
Riddington, G. ;
Laughton, R. .
FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2009, 96 (2-3) :259-266
[10]   Where are Cultural and Social in Ecosystem Services? A Framework for Constructive Engagement [J].
Chan, Kai M. A. ;
Guerry, Anne D. ;
Balvanera, Patricia ;
Klain, Sarah ;
Satterfield, Terre ;
Basurto, Xavier ;
Bostrom, Ann ;
Chuenpagdee, Ratana ;
Gould, Rachelle ;
Halpern, Benjamin S. ;
Hannahs, Neil ;
Levine, Jordan ;
Norton, Bryan ;
Ruckelshaus, Mary ;
Russell, Roly ;
Tam, Jordan ;
Woodside, Ulalia .
BIOSCIENCE, 2012, 62 (08) :744-756