Rapid Staining Using the Shorr Method for Intraoperative Peritoneal Washing Cytology in Advanced Gastric Cancer: a Pilot Study from a Single Institution

被引:4
作者
Son, Sang-Yong [1 ]
Choi, Hai-Young [2 ]
Lee, Yoontaek [3 ]
Park, Young Suk [3 ]
Shin, Dong Joon [3 ]
Oo, Aung Myint [3 ]
Jung, Do Hyun [3 ]
Ahn, Sang-Hoon [3 ]
Park, Do Joong [3 ]
Lee, Hye Seung [2 ]
Kim, Hyung-Ho [3 ]
机构
[1] Ajou Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Suwon, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Pathol, 82 Gumi Ro,173Beon Gil, Seongnam 13620, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Surg, 82 Gumi Ro,173Beon Gil, Seongnam 13620, South Korea
关键词
Gastric cancer; Laparoscopy; Intraoperative cytology; Staining; LAVAGE CYTOLOGY; CHEMOTHERAPY; OUTCOMES; AEROSOL; PHASE-3; TRIAL; FLUID; S-1;
D O I
10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e14
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Intraoperative peritoneal washing cytology (PWC) is used to determine treatment strategies for gastric cancer with suspected serosal invasion. However, a standard staining method for intraoperative PWC remains to be established. We evaluated the feasibility of a rapid and simple staining method using Shorr's stain for intraoperative PWC in advanced gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: Between November 2012 and December 2014, 77 patients with clinical T3 or higher gastric cancer were enrolled. The sensitivity, specificity, and concordance between the Shorr staining method and conventional Papanicolaou (Pap) staining with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) immunohistochemistry (IHC) were analyzed. Results: Intraoperative PWC was performed laparoscopically in 69 patients (89.6%). The average time of the procedure was 8.3 minutes, and the average amount of aspirated fluids was 83.3 mL. The average time for Shorr staining and pathologic review was 21.0 minutes. Of the 77 patients, 16 (20.7%) had positive cytology and 7 (9.1%) showed atypical findings; sensitivity and specificity were 73.6% and 98.2% for the Shorr method, and 78.9% and 98.2% for the Pap method with CEA IHC, respectively. Concordance of diagnosis between the 2 methods was observed in 90.9% of cases (weighted. statistic=0.875) and most disagreements in diagnoses occurred in atypical findings (6/7). In overall survival, there was no significant difference in C-index between the 2 methods (0.459 in Shorr method vs. 0.458 in Pap with CEA IHC method, P=0.987). Conclusions: Shorr staining could be a rapid and reliable method for intraoperative PWC in advanced gastric cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 182
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Amin M.B., 2017, AJCC CANC STAGING MA, VVIII ed.
  • [2] Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): a phase 3 open-label, randomised controlled trial
    Bang, Yung-Jue
    Kim, Young-Woo
    Yang, Han-Kwang
    Chung, Hyun Cheol
    Park, Young-Kyu
    Lee, Kyung Hee
    Lee, Keun-Wook
    Kim, Yong Ho
    Noh, Sang-Ik
    Cho, Jae Yong
    Mok, Young Jae
    Kim, Yeul Hong
    Ji, Jiafu
    Yeh, Ta-Sen
    Button, Peter
    Sirzen, Florin
    Noh, Sung Hoon
    [J]. LANCET, 2012, 379 (9813) : 315 - 321
  • [3] Peritoneal lavage cytology in gastric cancer: An independent predictor of outcome
    Burke, EC
    Karpeh, MS
    Conlon, KC
    Brennan, MF
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 5 (05) : 411 - 415
  • [4] Chen Lin, 2017, Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi, V20, P731
  • [5] Fitzmaurice C, 2017, JAMA ONCOL, V3, P524, DOI [10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688, 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2706]
  • [6] Gastrectomy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric cancer with a single non-curable factor (REGATTA): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial
    Fujitani, Kazumasa
    Yang, Han-Kwang
    Mizusawa, Junki
    Kim, Young-Woo
    Terashima, Masanori
    Han, Sang-Uk
    Iwasaki, Yoshiaki
    Hyung, Woo Jin
    Takagane, Akinori
    Park, Do Joong
    Yoshikawa, Takaki
    Hahn, Seokyung
    Nakamura, Kenichi
    Park, Cho Hyun
    Kurokawa, Yukinori
    Bang, Yung-Jue
    Park, Byung Joo
    Sasako, Mitsuru
    Tsujinaka, Toshimasa
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (03) : 309 - 318
  • [7] Comparison of three staining methods for the morphological evaluation of human spermatozoa
    Henkel, Ralf
    Schreiber, Gerhard
    Stunnhoefel, Anne
    Hipler, Uta-Christina
    Zermann, Dirk Henrik
    Menkveld, Roelof
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2008, 89 (02) : 449 - 455
  • [8] IKEGUCHI M, 1994, ANTICANCER RES, V14, P2131
  • [9] Surgery after intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis or positive peritoneal cytology findings
    Ishigami, Hironori
    Yamaguchi, Hironori
    Yamashita, Hiroharu
    Asakage, Masahiro
    Kitayama, Joji
    [J]. GASTRIC CANCER, 2017, 20 : S128 - S134
  • [10] Prognostic significance of peritoneal lavage cytology in staging gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jamel, Sara
    Markar, Sheraz R.
    Malietzis, George
    Acharya, Amish
    Athanasiou, Thanos
    Hanna, George B.
    [J]. GASTRIC CANCER, 2018, 21 (01) : 10 - 18