Type-1 OWA Unbalanced Fuzzy Linguistic Aggregation Methodology: Application to Eurobonds Credit Risk Evaluation

被引:27
作者
Chiclana, Francisco [1 ]
Mata, Francisco [2 ]
Perez, Luis G. [2 ]
Herrera-Viedma, Enrique [3 ]
机构
[1] De Montfort Univ, Ctr Computat Intelligence, Leicester, Leics, England
[2] Univ Jaen, Dept Comp Sci, Jaen, Spain
[3] Univ Granada, Dept Comp Sci, Granada, Spain
关键词
MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; REPRESENTATION MODEL; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; NUMERICAL SCALE; CONSENSUS MODEL; TERM SETS; INFORMATION; WORDS; OPERATORS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1002/int.21912
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In decision making, a widely used methodology to manage unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information is the linguistic hierarchy (LH), which relies on a linguistic symbolic computational model based on ordinal 2-tuple linguistic representation. However, the ordinal 2-tuple linguistic approach does not exploit all advantages of Zadeh's fuzzy linguistic approach to model uncertainty because the membership function shapes are ignored. Furthermore, the LH methodology is an indirect approach that relies on the uniform distribution of symmetric linguistic assessments. These drawbacks are overcome by applying a fuzzy methodology based on the implementation of the type-1 ordered weighted average (T1OWA) operator. The T1OWA operator is not a symbolic operator and it allows to directly aggregate membership functions, which in practice means that the T1OWA methodology is suitable for both balanced and unbalanced linguistic contexts and with heterogeneous membership functions. Furthermore, the final output of the T1OWA methodology is always fuzzy and defined in the same domain of the original unbalanced fuzzy linguistic labels, which facilitates its interpretation via a visual joint representation. A case study is presented where the T1OWA operator methodology is used to assess the creditworthiness of European bonds based on real credit risk ratings of individual Eurozone member states modeled as unbalanced fuzzy linguistic labels. (C) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1071 / 1088
页数:18
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, STUDIES FUZZINESS SO
[2]  
Bonissone P., 1986, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, P217, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.09.005
[3]   A CONSENSUS MODEL FOR GROUP DECISION MAKING PROBLEMS WITH UNBALANCED FUZZY LINGUISTIC INFORMATION [J].
Cabrerizo, F. J. ;
Alonso, S. ;
Herrera-Viedma, E. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2009, 8 (01) :109-131
[4]   Type-Reduction of General Type-2 Fuzzy Sets: The Type-1 OWA Approach [J].
Chiclana, Francisco ;
Zhou, Shang-Ming .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2013, 28 (05) :505-522
[5]   Linguistic multi-criteria decision-making model with output variable expressive richness [J].
Cid-Lopez, Andres ;
Hornos, Miguel J. ;
Alberto Carrasco, Ramon ;
Herrera-Viedma, Enrique ;
Chiclana, Francisco .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2017, 83 :350-362
[6]   Linguistic modeling by hierarchical systems of linguistic rules [J].
Cordón, O ;
Herrera, F ;
Zwir, I .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2002, 10 (01) :2-20
[7]   ON AGGREGATION OPERATIONS OF LINGUISTIC LABELS [J].
DELGADO, M ;
VERDEGAY, JL ;
VILA, MA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 1993, 8 (03) :351-370
[8]   LINGUISTIC DECISION-MAKING MODELS [J].
DELGADO, M ;
VERDEGAY, JL ;
VILA, MA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 1992, 7 (05) :479-492
[9]  
Dong YC, 2014, IEEE INT FUZZY SYST, P455, DOI 10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE.2014.6891607
[10]   Consensus-Based Group Decision Making Under Multi-granular Unbalanced 2-Tuple Linguistic Preference Relations [J].
Dong, Yucheng ;
Li, Cong-Cong ;
Xu, Yinfeng ;
Gu, Xin .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2015, 24 (02) :217-242