Comparative life cycle assessment of MSWI fly ash treatment and disposal

被引:66
作者
Huber, Florian [1 ]
Laner, David [1 ]
Fellner, Johann [1 ]
机构
[1] TU Wien, Inst Water Qual Resource & Waste Management, Karlspl 13-226, A-1040 Vienna, Austria
关键词
Fly ash; Waste incineration; Life cycle assessment; Combustion residues; SOLID-WASTE INCINERATOR; LONG-TERM EMISSIONS; HEAVY-METALS; POLLUTION-CONTROL; THERMAL-TREATMENT; RESIDUES; RECOVERY; UNCERTAINTY; LANDFILLS; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2017.06.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) fly ash constitutes a hazardous waste. The possibilities for managing this waste comprise disposal at underground deposits or at above-ground landfills after cement stabilisation, application of the FLUREC process, thermal treatment in a dedicated furnace or thermal co-treatment together with combustible hazardous waste. A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) study was conducted in order to assess the environmental impact of these five MSWI fly ash disposal options with regard to two different time horizons (100 years, indefinite). The uncertainties of the input parameters were propagated by Monte Carlo simulations (MCS). As could be shown by the discemibility analysis, the FLUREC process has the lowest impact in more than 90% of the MCS results. In case longterm emissions (beyond 100 years) are neglected, the second lowest impact is caused by thermal co-treatment in more than 90% of the MCS results. Consideration of long-term emissions indicates the disposal at underground deposits as second best option. Furthermore, it is shown that stabilisation with cement has the second highest and thermal treatment in a dedicated furnace has the highest environmental impact, mostly due to high CO2 emissions. Therefore these two treatment options should be avoided in the future. Besides the comparative evaluation of the different options, it could be shown that uncertainty analysis is useful to determine the relevance of long-term emissions for the ranking of different systems. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:392 / 403
页数:12
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [11] Bosch M.E., 2011, OKOBILANZIELLE UNTER
  • [12] Brunner P.H., 2003, Practical Handbook of Material Flow Analysis
  • [13] Waste to energy - key element for sustainable waste management
    Brunner, Paul H.
    Rechberger, Helmut
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 37 : 3 - 12
  • [14] Buhler A., 2010, KVA RUCKSTANDE SCHWE
  • [15] Calabro P. S., 2016, P 5 INT C IND HAZ WA
  • [16] Chandler A.J., 1997, MUNICIPAL SOLID WAST
  • [17] Chang NB, 2015, SUSTAINABLE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT: A SYSTEMS ENGINEERING APPROACH, P1, DOI 10.1002/9781119035848
  • [18] Quantifying uncertainty in LCA-modelling of waste management systems
    Clavreul, Julie
    Guyonnet, Dominique
    Christensen, Thomas H.
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 32 (12) : 2482 - 2495
  • [19] Waste treatment and assessment of long-term emissions
    Doka, G
    Hischier, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2005, 10 (01) : 77 - 84
  • [20] Doka G., 2003, LIFE CYCLE INVENTO 3