Associations Between Mindfulness, Psychological Well-Being, and Subjective Well-Being with Respect to Contemplative Practice

被引:72
作者
Hanley, Adam [1 ]
Warner, Alia [1 ]
Garland, Eric L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Educ Psychol & Learning Syst, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Huntsman Canc Inst, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
Mindfulness; Psychological well-being; Subjective well-being; Contemplative practice; CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; STRESS REDUCTION; SATISFACTION; MEDITATION; MECHANISMS; HAPPINESS; SYMPTOMS; BENEFITS; HEALTH; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1007/s10902-014-9569-5
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The relationship between mindfulness and well-being has received considerable empirical and theoretical attention in the scientific literature recently, with researchers hypothesizing a number of ways in which the two interact. However, a closer examination of the literature indicates that the two primary conceptualizations of well-being, psychological well-being (PWB) and subjective well-being (SWB), are theoretically distinct, yet regularly conflated and rarely examined in tandem. As such, the purpose of this study was to explore the associations between dispositional mindfulness, SWB, and PWB, with respect to contemplative practice, using canonical correlation analysis to examine data derived from an online sample of 361 respondents (106 contemplative practitioners and 245 non-practitioners). Results indicate that contemplative practitioners typically report significantly higher levels of mindfulness, as well as psychological and SWB. Furthermore, dispositional mindfulness is associated with both PWB and SWB, but more closely associated with PWB, irrespective of contemplative practice experience. Finally, mindfulness and well-being appear to be similarly related regardless of contemplative practice, although our findings suggest that contemplative practitioners and non-practitioners may conceptualize SWB differently. Contemplative practitioners appear to group PWB and SWB together in a unified well-being construct, while non-practitioners appear to conceptualize SWB as distinct from PWB.
引用
收藏
页码:1423 / 1436
页数:14
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ACM CHI C HUM FACT C, DOI DOI 10.1145/1753846.1753873
[2]   Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness [J].
Baer, RA ;
Smith, GT ;
Hopkins, J ;
Krietemeyer, J ;
Toney, L .
ASSESSMENT, 2006, 13 (01) :27-45
[3]   Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples [J].
Baer, Ruth A. ;
Smith, Gregory T. ;
Lykins, Emily ;
Button, Daniel ;
Krietemeyer, Jennifer ;
Sauer, Shannon ;
Walsh, Erin ;
Duggan, Danielle ;
Williams, J. Mark G. .
ASSESSMENT, 2008, 15 (03) :329-342
[4]   Mindfulness Training Effects for Parents and Educators of Children With Special Needs [J].
Benn, Rita ;
Akiva, Tom ;
Arel, Sari ;
Roeser, Robert W. .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 48 (05) :1476-1487
[5]   Separating the Shirkers from the Workers? Making Sure Respondents Pay Attention on Self-Administered Surveys [J].
Berinsky, Adam J. ;
Margolis, Michele F. ;
Sances, Michael W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 58 (03) :739-753
[6]   What does mindfulness really mean? A canonical perspective [J].
Bodhi, Bhikkhu .
CONTEMPORARY BUDDHISM, 2011, 12 (01) :19-39
[7]   Relationships between mindfulness, self-control, and psychological functioning [J].
Bowlin, Stephanie L. ;
Baer, Ruth A. .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2012, 52 (03) :411-415
[8]   When what one has is enough: Mindfulness, financial desire discrepancy, and subjective well-being [J].
Brown, Kirk Warren ;
Kasser, Tim ;
Ryan, Richard M. ;
Linley, P. Alex ;
Orzech, Kevin .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2009, 43 (05) :727-736
[9]   Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle [J].
Brown, KW ;
Kasser, T .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2005, 74 (02) :349-368
[10]   The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being [J].
Brown, KW ;
Ryan, RM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 84 (04) :822-848