Development and application of the orthotics and prosthetics user survey: Applications and opportunities for health care quality improvement

被引:0
作者
Heinemann, AW [1 ]
Gershon, R [1 ]
Fisher, WP [1 ]
机构
[1] Rehabil Inst Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
来源
Proceedings of the American Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists | 2006年
关键词
computerized adaptive testing; orthotics and prosthetics; outcome measurement; patient satisfaction; quality improvement;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The health care industry does not compete on the basis of accepted, valid measures of clinical quality. Experts have argued that quality improvement should be undertaken by health care facilities on behalf of their patients and communities, not solely as an accreditation exercise. Health care quality instruments are rarely developed with the care and precision taken for granted in other industries; thus, we do not know what we are measuring. Without this knowledge, we cannot manage effectively. Even if some providers establish the reliability and construct validity of their quality measures, they are not using a common unit, making it difficult or impossible to know if we are managing the same construct or if we are doing so with the same degree of effectiveness in different settings. The orthotics and prosthetics (O&P) service delivery system urgently needs a means of measuring and enhancing health care quality given the fragmented nature of the industry. No industry-wide instrument is accepted for quality improvement. This article describes the development of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Survey (OPUS), an instrument that evaluates the typical goals of O&P providers: reduction of activity limitations, enhancing quality of life, and assuring patient satisfaction with services and devices. Widespread adoption of an instrument such as OPUS would help make quality measurement "Job Zero" in the improvement of care processes and outcomes for orthotics and prosthetic users.
引用
收藏
页码:P80 / P85
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
*AM ORTH PROSTH AS, 1998, O P ALMANAC JAN
[2]  
Bode Rita K, 2003, J Appl Meas, V4, P124
[3]  
Cella D, 2000, MED CARE, V38, P66
[4]  
CHANG CH, 1997, PHYS MED REHABILITAT, V311, P97
[5]  
DAVIS KM, 2002, QUAL LIFE RES, V11, P134
[6]   Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Detmar, SB ;
Muller, MJ ;
Schornagel, JH ;
Wever, LDV ;
Aaronson, NK .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (23) :3027-3034
[7]  
GERSHON RC, 2004, MEASUREMENT ISSUES P
[8]  
Gershon Richard, 2003, Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, V3, P783, DOI 10.1586/14737167.3.6.783
[9]  
Hart DL., 1999, J PROSTHET ORTHOT, V11, P101
[10]   Development and measurement properties of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS): a comprehensive set of clinical outcome instruments [J].
Heinemann, AW ;
Bode, RK ;
O'Reilly, C .
PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 27 (03) :191-206