Women's characteristics and care outcomes of caseload midwifery care in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study

被引:8
作者
Offerhaus, Pien [1 ]
Jans, Suze [2 ]
Hukkelhoven, Chantal [3 ]
de Vries, Raymond [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne [1 ]
机构
[1] ZUYD Univ, Res Ctr Midwifery Sci Midwifery Educ & Studies, Univ Singel 60, NL-6229 ER Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] TNO, Dept Child Hlth, Schipholweg 77, NL-2316 ZL Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Perined, Mercatorlaan 1200, NL-3528 BL Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, CAPHRI, Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, POB 616, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Univ Michigan, Ctr Bioeth & Social Sci Med, Sch Med, 2800 Plymouth Rd,Bldg 14, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Continuity of care; Caseload midwifery; Primary health care; Birth outcomes; BIRTH; LABOR; CONTINUITY; REFERRALS; MODEL; RISK;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-020-03204-3
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe maternity care system in the Netherlands is well known for its support of community-based midwifery. However, regular midwifery practices typically do not offer caseload midwifery care - one-to-one continuity of care throughout pregnancy and birth. Because we know very little about the outcomes for women receiving caseload care in the Netherlands, we compared caseload care with regular midwife-led care, looking at maternal and perinatal outcomes, including antenatal and intrapartum referrals to secondary (i.e., obstetrician-led) care.MethodsWe selected 657 women in caseload care and 1954 matched controls (women in regular midwife-led care) from all women registered in the Dutch Perinatal Registry (Perined) who gave birth in 2015. To be eligible for selection the women had to be in midwife-led antenatal care beyond 28 gestational weeks. Each woman in caseload care was matched with three women in regular midwife-led care, using parity, maternal age, background (Dutch or non-Dutch) and region. These two cohorts were compared for referral rates, mode of birth, and other maternal and perinatal outcomes.ResultsIn caseload midwifery care, 46.9% of women were referred to obstetrician-led care (24.2% antenatally and 22.8% in the intrapartum period). In the matched cohort, 65.7% were referred (37.4% antenatally and 28.3% in the intrapartum period). In caseload care, 84.0% experienced a spontaneous vaginal birth versus 77.0% in regular midwife-led care. These patterns were observed for both nulliparous and multiparous women. Women in caseload care had fewer inductions of labour (13.2% vs 21.0%), more homebirths (39.4% vs 16.1%) and less perineal damage (intact perineum: 41.3% vs 28.2%). The incidence of perinatal mortality and a low Apgar score was low in both groups.ConclusionsWe found that when compared to regular midwife-led care, caseload midwifery care in the Netherlands is associated with a lower referral rate to obstetrician-led care - both antenatally and in the intrapartum period - and a higher spontaneous vaginal birth rate, with similar perinatal safety. The challenge is to include this model as part of the current effort to improve the quality of Dutch maternity care, making caseload care available and affordable for more women.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   A trend analysis in referrals during pregnancy and labour in Dutch midwifery care 1988-2004 [J].
Amelink-Verburg, M. P. ;
Rijnders, M. E. B. ;
Buitendijk, S. E. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2009, 116 (07) :923-932
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, VERL VAD EINDR COMM
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, ZORGB 2014 PREST NED
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, AG GEB 2018 2022 INT
[5]   A comparison of partnership caseload midwifery care with conventional team midwifery care: labour and birth outcomes [J].
Benjamin, Y ;
Walsh, D ;
Taub, N .
MIDWIFERY, 2001, 17 (03) :234-240
[6]   Caseload midwifery as organisational change: the interplay between professional and organisational projects in Denmark [J].
Burau, Viola ;
Overgaard, Charlotte .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2015, 15
[7]   Implementing caseload midwifery: Exploring the views of maternity managers in Australia - A national cross-sectional survey [J].
Dawson, Kate ;
McLachlan, Helen ;
Newton, Michelle ;
Forster, Della .
WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2016, 29 (03) :214-222
[8]   Mode of birth and medical interventions among women at low risk of complications: A cross-national comparison of birth settings in England and the Netherlands [J].
de Jonge, Ank ;
Peters, Lilian ;
Geerts, Caroline C. ;
van Roosmalen, Jos J. M. ;
Twisk, Jos W. R. ;
Brocklehurst, Peter ;
Hollowell, Jennifer .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (07)
[9]   "Someone's rooting for you": Continuity, advocacy and street-level bureaucracy in UK maternal healthcare [J].
Finlay, Susanna ;
Sandall, Jane .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2009, 69 (08) :1228-1235
[10]  
Fontein Yvonne, 2010, Women Birth, V23, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.wombi.2010.01.002