Incorporating agri-environment schemes into farm development pathways: A temporal analysis of farmer motivations

被引:76
作者
Ingram, Julie [1 ]
Gaskell, Peter [1 ]
Mills, Jane [1 ]
Short, Chris [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gloucestershire, Countryside & Community Res Inst, Gloucester GL2 9HW, England
关键词
Agri-environment schemes; Motivation; Farm development pathways; Family farms; Wales; Tir Gofal; LAND DIVERSION SCHEMES; CONSERVATION PRACTICES; PARTICIPATION; MANAGEMENT; VALUES; GOALS; CONCEPTUALIZATIONS; STRATEGIES; KNOWLEDGES; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.07.007
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper aims to capture the complexity and dynamic nature of motivations for participation in agri-environment schemes (AESs). Specifically, it examines the extent to which decisions about family farm participation in Tir Gofal (TG), a whole farm AES in Wales, can be traced to long-term motivations for farm continuity; and how Tir Gofal fits into dynamic farm development pathways that farmers follow to ensure their continuity. It reports the findings from narrative style interviews with 25 TG agreement holders and 12 non-agreement holders across Wales. The results show that the continuance of the family farm is an important goal for agreement and nonagreement holders alike, and this is linked to enduring commercially or traditionally oriented values. Three broad sets of development pathways were identified and the extent to which TG fits in with these pathways is considered, with particular reference to different periods in the farm life cycle. The paper concludes that incorporating a temporal dimension into the wider question of farmers' participation in agri-environment schemes can help to improve understanding of farmers' behaviour particularly given the variety of possible opportunities currently open to, and used by, family farms. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 279
页数:13
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Agra CEAS Consulting, 2005, SOC EV TIR GOF
[2]  
Agra Ceas Consulting, 2003, MIDT EV RUR DEV PLAN
[3]   Farmers and nature conservation: What is known about attitudes, context factors and actions affecting conservation? [J].
Ahnstrom, Johan ;
Hockert, Jenny ;
Bergea, Hanna L. ;
Francis, Charles A. ;
Skelton, Peter ;
Hallgren, Lars .
RENEWABLE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SYSTEMS, 2009, 24 (01) :38-47
[4]   Socio-economic constraints and environmentally friendly farming in the Southwest of England [J].
Battershill, MRJ ;
Gilg, AW .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 1997, 13 (02) :213-228
[5]   The development of alternative farm enterprises: A study of family labour farms in the northern Pennines of England [J].
Bowler, I ;
Clark, G ;
Crockett, A ;
Ilbery, B ;
Shaw, A .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 1996, 12 (03) :285-295
[6]  
Bowler I. R., 1992, Contemporary rural systems in transition, Volume 1: agriculture and environment., P237
[7]   Farmer goals and management styles: Implications for advancing biologically based agriculture [J].
Brodt, S ;
Klonsky, K ;
Tourte, L .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2006, 89 (01) :90-105
[8]   FARMER PARTICIPATION IN VOLUNTARY LAND DIVERSION SCHEMES - SOME OBSERVATIONS FROM THEORY [J].
BROTHERTON, I .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 1989, 5 (03) :299-304
[9]   Injecting social psychology theory into conceptualisations of agricultural agency: Towards a post-productivist farmer self-identity? [J].
Burton, RJF ;
Wilson, GA .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2006, 22 (01) :95-115
[10]   Reconceptuali sing the 'behavioural approach' in agricultural studies: a socio-psychological perspective [J].
Burton, RJF .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2004, 20 (03) :359-371