Evaluation of Selected Criteria in the Buildings Life Cycle from the Perspective of Supplier and User

被引:0
|
作者
Sychrova, Lucie [1 ]
Simberova, Iveta [1 ]
机构
[1] Brno Univ Technol, Inst Management, Fac Business & Management, CS-61090 Brno, Czech Republic
关键词
contractor; construction costs; construction; building users; the life cycle of construction;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to evaluate the importance of the selected criteria considered in the preparatory stage of the life cycle of buildings having an impact on the life of the building. Set of criteria is evaluated in terms of contractor and subsequently in terms of building users. The aim is to determine how many different significance criteria from the perspective of both parties. On the basis of European standards ISO 15686-5 was chosen set of criteria and compiled a questionnaire. Data were collected using a standardized questionnaire. The object of the research is a set of construction enterprises with prevailing construction activity, classified according to the classification of economic activities NACE under "Construction" and a set of users of new buildings intended primarily for housing. Scientific contribution of this paper is to compare the importance of the selected criteria from two perspectives - view construction company and building users. Rational decision-making on economic aspects of construction required in the preparatory stage of construction the existence of a number of criteria. Research conducted in this paper clearly showed that the greatest significance in the assessment criteria with the suppliers and users of buildings in the most different areas of operation, maintenance and renewal costs. Wider practical use of research results alludes to certain limits. For example, the motivation of construction enterprises to use the findings of this contribution in the preparation of buildings in their real practice and especially access to relevatnim data. Building contractors in the event of thinking these costs had to choose higher quality and therefore more expensive building materials and technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:3167 / 3172
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Concrete Self-Healing for Sustainable Buildings: A Focus on the Economic Evaluation from a Life-Cycle Perspective
    Uguzzoni, Andres Miguel Panza
    Fregonara, Elena
    Ferrando, Diego Giuseppe
    Anglani, Giovanni
    Antonaci, Paola
    Tulliani, Jean-Marc
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (18)
  • [2] Comparison of Three HVAC systems in Commercial Buildings from a Life Cycle Perspective
    Chen, Shuo
    Zhang, Guomin
    2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (ICFMSE 2011), VOL 1, 2011, 5 : 82 - 87
  • [3] Ecologically benign lubricants -: evaluation from a life cycle perspective
    Herrmann, Christoph
    Hesselbachl, Juergen
    Bock, Ralf
    Zein, Andre
    Oehlschlaeger, Gerlind
    Dettmer, Tina
    CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER, 2007, 35 (05) : 427 - 432
  • [4] On criteria for the evaluation of life cycle assessment software
    Heijungs, Reinout
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (09): : 1475 - 1476
  • [5] On criteria for the evaluation of life cycle assessment software
    Reinout Heijungs
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22 : 1475 - 1476
  • [6] Embodied Energy and Carbon Emissions of DOE Prototype Buildings from a Life Cycle Perspective
    Arehart, Jay H.
    Srubar, Wil V., III
    Pomponi, Francesco
    D'Amico, Bernardino
    ASHRAE TRANSACTIONS 2020, VOL 126, 2020, 126 : 38 - 46
  • [7] Residential Construction with a Focus on Evaluation of the Life Cycle of Buildings
    Hromada, Eduard
    Vitasek, Stanislav
    Holcman, Jakub
    Schneiderova Heralova, Renata
    Krulicky, Tomas
    BUILDINGS, 2021, 11 (11)
  • [8] Evaluation of environmental impacts of historic buildings conservation through Life Cycle Assessment in a circular economy perspective
    Gravagnuolo, Antonia
    Angrisano, Mariarosaria
    Nativo, Matteo
    AESTIMUM, 2020, : 241 - 272
  • [9] Sustainability evaluation of retrofitting solutions for rural buildings through life cycle approach and multi-criteria analysis
    Rocchi, L.
    Kadzinski, M.
    Menconi, M. E.
    Grohmann, D.
    Miebs, G.
    Paolotti, L.
    Boggia, A.
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2018, 173 : 281 - 290
  • [10] EVALUATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF ROAD PAVEMENTS FROM A LIFE CYCLE PERSPECTIVE
    Dumitrescu, Laura
    Maxineasa, Sebastian George
    Simion, Isabela Maria
    Taranu, Nicolae
    Andrei, Radu
    Gavrilescu, Maria
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2014, 13 (02): : 449 - 455