VOID FRACTION MEASUREMENT AND PREDICTION OF TWO-PHASE BOILING FLOWS IN A TUBULAR TEST SECTION

被引:0
作者
Liu, Qingqing [1 ]
Diaz, Julio [1 ]
Petrov, Victor [1 ]
Burak, Adam [1 ]
Manera, Annalisa [1 ]
Kelly, Joseph [2 ]
Sun, Xiaodong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] US Nucl Regulatory Commiss, Washington, DC USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF 2021 28TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING (ICONE28), VOL 2 | 2021年
关键词
Void fraction; flow visualization; X-ray radiography system; gamma densitometer; MCFD; GAMMA-DENSITOMETER; HIGH-PRESSURE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
Void fraction is one of the most important parameters that affect two-phase flow heat transfer and pressure drop. In this paper, a commercial gamma densitometer and a high-speed X-ray radiography system developed at the University of Michigan (UM) are used to measure the void fraction in two-phase boiling flows, with water as the working fluid, in a tubular test section. The test section is made of Incoloy 800H/HT with a total length of 1.589 m, an inner diameter of 12.95 mm, and a wall thickness of 3.05 mm. These two instrumentation systems are installed on a traversing platform that travels along the vertical test section for measurements at multiple elevations. Subcooled flow boiling and natural convection boiling experiments are performed to measure the void fraction in the test section. Flow visualization images are obtained for bubbly and slug flows from the X-ray radiography system. The wall temperature of the test section is measured at 17 elevations by thermocouples. In addition to the experiments, a multiphase computational fluid dynamics (MCFD) model is developed using ANSYS FLUENT to simulate the subcooled flow boiling. The measured wall temperature and void fraction from the experiments are compared with the MCFD simulation results. The RMS (Root mean square) errors are 3.6% and 16.1% for the wall temperature and void fraction, respectively, between the experimental data and MCFD simulations.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Adams R., 2017, PROC 17 INT TOPICAL
[2]   Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics in Simulating Film Boiling of Cryogens [J].
Ahammad, Monir ;
Liu, Yi ;
Olewski, Tomasz ;
Vechot, Luc N. ;
Mannan, M. Sam .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2016, 55 (27) :7548-7557
[3]   X-Ray Flow Visualization in Multiphase Flows [J].
Aliseda, Alberto ;
Heindel, Theodore J. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, VOL 53, 2021, 53 :543-567
[4]   ANALYSIS OF PHASE DISTRIBUTION IN FULLY-DEVELOPED LAMINAR BUBBLY 2-PHASE FLOW [J].
ANTAL, SP ;
LAHEY, RT ;
FLAHERTY, JE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW, 1991, 17 (05) :635-652
[5]  
Burns A.D., 2004, 5 INT C MULT FLOW IC, V4, P1
[6]  
Butterworth D., 1975, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, V1, P845, DOI 10.1016/0301-9322(75)90038-5
[7]   A PHOTOGRAPHIC STUDY OF POOL BOILING IN THE REGION OF THE CRITICAL HEAT FLUX [J].
COLE, R .
AICHE JOURNAL, 1960, 6 (04) :533-538
[8]   Comparison of Void Fraction Correlations for Different Flow Patterns in Upward Vertical Two-Phase Flow [J].
Godbole, Pranav V. ;
Tang, Clement C. ;
Ghajar, Afshin J. .
HEAT TRANSFER ENGINEERING, 2011, 32 (10) :843-860
[9]   Modeling of subcooled boiling by extending the RPI wall boiling model to ultra-high pressure conditions [J].
Gu, Junping ;
Wang, Qinggong ;
Wu, Yuxin ;
Lyu, Junfu ;
Li, Suhui ;
Yao, Wei .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 124 :571-584
[10]   An X-ray system for visualizing fluid flows [J].
Heindel, Theodore J. ;
Gray, Joseph N. ;
Jensen, Terrence C. .
FLOW MEASUREMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION, 2008, 19 (02) :67-78