A national consensus on outcomes and indicators for diabetes patient education

被引:36
作者
Colagiuri, R. [1 ]
Eigenmann, C. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Diabet Unit, Menzies Ctr Hlth Policy, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
diabetes patient education; indicators; national consensus; outcomes; SELF-MANAGEMENT EDUCATION; METAANALYSIS; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02700.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To develop a national evidence and consensus position on the desired goals, outcomes and indicators of diabetes patient education (DPE). A mixture of qualitative and quantitative methods were used including: (i) literature reviews to identify existing definitions, issues and work in the area; (ii) interviews with key opinion leaders; (iii) focus groups with people with diabetes; (iv) a national survey of diabetes education service providers; (v) a systematic consultation process culminating in a national stakeholder forum. Three overarching goals were identified as the main purpose of diabetes patient education: (i) optimal adjustment to living with diabetes, (ii) optimal health outcomes and (iii) optimal cost-effectiveness (for the individual and for society). Given the difficulty in attributing cause and effect between education and clinical or cost outcomes and that mechanisms already exist for collecting data on clinical endpoints and surrogate indicators, the development of education indicators concentrated on the goal of optimal adjustment to living with diabetes. Four key outcomes for this goal were listed in order as either directly attributable to DPE or in which DPE plays a discernable role: knowledge and understanding, self-determination, self-management and psychological adjustment. The consensus position represents a sound evidence-informed platform on which diabetes education policy, programmes, data collection and research can be based. However, further work was required to test and make recommendations about applying potentially relevant psychometric tools to measure changes in the identified indicators.
引用
收藏
页码:442 / 446
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Diabetes care and patient-oriented outcomes [J].
Berger, M ;
Mühlhauser, I .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 281 (18) :1676-1678
[2]  
COLAGIURI R, 2004, INFORM ED PEOPLE WIT
[3]   Effectiveness of the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial [J].
Davies, M. J. ;
Heller, S. ;
Skinner, T. C. ;
Campbell, M. J. ;
Carey, M. E. ;
Cradock, S. ;
Dallosso, H. M. ;
Daly, H. ;
Doherty, Y. ;
Eaton, S. ;
Fox, C. ;
Oliver, L. ;
Rantell, K. ;
Rayman, G. ;
Khunti, K. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7642) :491-495
[4]   RETRACTED: Group based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus - art. no. CD003417.pub2 (Retracted Article) [J].
Deakin, T ;
McShane, C ;
Cade, JE ;
Williams, RDRR .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2005, (02)
[5]   Structured patient education: the Diabetes X-PERT Programme makes a difference [J].
Deakin, T. A. ;
Cade, J. E. ;
Williams, R. ;
Greenwood, D. C. .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2006, 23 (09) :944-954
[6]   Diabetes patient education: a meta-analysis and meta-regression [J].
Ellis, SE ;
Speroff, T ;
Dittus, RS ;
Brown, A ;
Pichert, JW ;
Elasy, TA .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2004, 52 (01) :97-105
[7]   Diabetes patient education research: An integrative literature review [J].
Fain, JA ;
Nettles, A ;
Funnell, MM ;
Charron, D .
DIABETES EDUCATOR, 1999, 25 (06) :7-15
[8]   EVALUATING DIABETES EDUCATION - ARE WE MEASURING THE MOST IMPORTANT OUTCOMES [J].
GLASGOW, RE ;
OSTEEN, VL .
DIABETES CARE, 1992, 15 (10) :1423-1432
[9]  
Glasgow RE, 1999, DIABETES EDUCATOR, V25, P74, DOI 10.1177/014572179902500625
[10]  
Home P., 1999, Health Outcome Indicators: Diabetes Mellitus