Complete and Partial Organizing for Corporate Social Responsibility

被引:72
|
作者
Rasche, Andreas [1 ]
de Bakker, Frank G. A. [2 ]
Moon, Jeremy [3 ]
机构
[1] CBS Ctr Corp Social Responsibil, Copenhagen Business Sch, DK-2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Org Sci, Fac Social Sci, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Nottingham, Sch Business, ICCSR, Nottingham NG8 1BB, England
关键词
Organization studies; Corporate social responsibility; CSR standards; Cross-sector partnerships; Partial organization; Institutional theory; Complete organization; DISCOURSE ETHICS; BUSINESS; CODES; ACCOUNTABILITY; INSTITUTIONALIZATION; ORGANIZATIONS; PARTNERSHIPS; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; IDENTITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-013-1824-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper investigates different modes of organizing for corporate social responsibility (CSR). Based on insights from organization theory, we theorize two ways to organize for CSR. "Complete" organization for CSR happens within businesses and depends on the availability of certain organizational elements (e.g., membership, hierarchy, rules, monitoring, and sanctioning). By contrast, "partial" organization for CSR happens when organizers do not have direct access to all these organizational elements. We discuss partial organization for CSR by analyzing how standards and cross-sector partnerships make selective use of organizational elements. We maintain that an important feature of the increasing institutionalization of CSR-not only within businesses but also among non-governmental, governmental, and professional actors-is the rise of partial forms of organization. We discuss the contributions to this Special Issue in the context of our theorization of complete/partial organization for CSR and outline avenues for further research.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 663
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Complete and Partial Organizing for Corporate Social Responsibility
    Andreas Rasche
    Frank G. A. de Bakker
    Jeremy Moon
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2013, 115 : 651 - 663
  • [2] Collective Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Trust as an Organizing Principle
    Henry, Leona A.
    Moellering, Guido
    MANAGEMENT REVUE, 2019, 30 (2-3) : 173 - 191
  • [3] The Paradox of Corporate Social Responsibility Standards
    de Colle, Simone
    Henriques, Adrian
    Sarasvathy, Saras
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2014, 125 (02) : 177 - 191
  • [4] Human Rights and the Grammar of Corporate Social Responsibility
    O'Kelly, Ciaran
    SOCIAL & LEGAL STUDIES, 2019, 28 (05) : 625 - 649
  • [5] AN ORGANIZING FRAMEWORK FOR CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY THEORIES
    Windsor, Duane
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL MEETING OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR BUSINESS AND SOCIETY, 2011, 22 : 151 - 162
  • [6] Social Media Policies: Implications for Contemporary Notions of Corporate Social Responsibility
    Stohl, Cynthia
    Etter, Michael
    Banghart, Scott
    Woo, DaJung
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2017, 142 (03) : 413 - 436
  • [7] Why do corporate actors engage in pro-social behaviour? A Bourdieusian perspective on corporate social responsibility
    van Aaken, Dominik
    Splitter, Violetta
    Seidl, David
    ORGANIZATION, 2013, 20 (03) : 349 - 371
  • [8] Corporate Social Responsibility as Obligated Internalisation of Social Costs
    Johnston, Andrew
    Amaeshi, Kenneth
    Adegbite, Emmanuel
    Osuji, Onyeka
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2021, 170 (01) : 39 - 52
  • [9] Corporate Social Responsibility as Institution: A Social Mechanisms Framework
    Bice, Sara
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2017, 143 (01) : 17 - 34
  • [10] Corporate social responsibility, mining and "audit culture"
    Kemp, Deanna
    Owen, John R.
    van de Graaff, Shashi
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 24 : 1 - 10