Mandibular kinematics and maximum voluntary bite force following segmental resection of the mandible without or with reconstruction

被引:18
作者
Linsen, Sabine S. [1 ]
Oikonomou, Annina [1 ]
Martini, Markus [2 ]
Teschke, Marcus [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Bonn, Dept Prosthodont Preclin Educ & Dent Mat Sci, Welschnonnenstr 17, D-53111 Bonn, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Bonn, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Plast Surg, Welschnonnenstr 17, D-53111 Bonn, Germany
关键词
Segmental resection; Mandibular kinematics; Bite force; Autologous reconstruction of mandible; TMJ TJR; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PAIN; REPRODUCIBILITY; REPLACEMENT; MASTICATION; TRACKING; CANCER; MOTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-017-2263-3
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives The purpose was to analyze mandibular kinematics and maximum voluntary bite force in patients following segmental resection of the mandible without and with reconstruction (autologous bone, alloplastic total temporomandibular joint replacement (TMJ TJR)). Materials and methods Subjects operated from April 2002 to August 2014 were enrolled in the study. Condylar (CRoM) and incisal (InRoM) range of motion and deflection during opening, condylar retrusion, incisal lateral excursion, mandibular rotation angle during opening, and maximum voluntary bite force were determined on the non-affected site and compared between groups. Influence of co-factors (defect size, soft tissue deficit, neck dissection, radiotherapy, occlusal contact zones (OCZ), and time) was determined. Results Twelve non-reconstructed and 26 reconstructed patients (13 autologous, 13 TMJ TJR) were included in the study. InRoM opening and bite force were significantly higher (P <= .024), and both condylar and incisal deflection during opening significantly lower (P <= .027) in reconstructed patients compared with non-reconstructed. Differences between the autologous and the TMJ TJR group were statistically not significant. Co-factors defect size, soft tissue deficit, and neck dissection had the greatest impact on kinematics and number of OCZs on bite force. Conclusions Reconstructed patients (both autologous and TMJ TJR) have better overall function than non-reconstructed patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1707 / 1716
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Mandibular kinematics and maximum voluntary bite force following segmental resection of the mandible without or with reconstruction
    Sabine S. Linsen
    Annina Oikonomou
    Markus Martini
    Marcus Teschke
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2018, 22 : 1707 - 1716
  • [2] Growth curves for mandibular range of motion and maximum voluntary bite force in healthy children
    Verkouteren, Daan R. C.
    de Sonnaville, Willemijn F. C.
    Zuithoff, Nicolaas P. A.
    Wulffraat, Nico M.
    Steenks, Michel H.
    Rosenberg, Antoine J. W. P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 2022, 130 (03)
  • [3] Use of Kinesiography to Assess Mandibular Function Following Segmental Resection and Microvascular Reconstruction
    Venturi, Giulio
    Defila, Luca
    Battaglia, Salvatore
    Cicciu, Marco
    Crimi, Salvatore
    Bianchi, Aberto
    Marchetti, Claudio
    Tarsitano, Achille
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 31 (08) : 2256 - 2259
  • [4] Maximum voluntary bite force in patients with alloplastic total TMJ replacement - A prospective study
    Linsen, Sabine S.
    Reich, Rudolf H.
    Teschke, Marcus
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 41 (05) : 423 - 428
  • [5] A Preliminary Report of Maximum Voluntary Bite Force of Young Indian Population
    Ranjan, Madhu
    Singh, Bishnupati
    Kumar, Surender
    Tushar
    Rani, Priya
    Singh, Anupama
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 16 : S803 - S805
  • [6] Maximum voluntary molar bite force in subjects with malocclusion: multifactor analysis
    Alam, Mohammad Khursheed
    Alfawzan, Ahmed Ali
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 48 (10)
  • [7] A case of glandular odontogenic cyst with mandibular segmental resection and secondary reconstruction
    Yusa, Kazuyuki
    Ishikawa, Shigeo
    Yamanouchi, Hideyuki
    Edamatsu, Kaoru
    Hemmi, Tomoharu
    Ueda, Shouhei
    Kabasawa, Takanobu
    Iino, Mitsuyoshi
    ORAL SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 17 (03) : 196 - 200
  • [8] A possible association between medial depression of mandibular ramus and maximum bite force
    Adisen, M. Z.
    Okkesim, A.
    Misirlioglu, M.
    FOLIA MORPHOLOGICA, 2018, 77 (04) : 711 - 716
  • [9] Relative contributions of occlusion, maximum bite force, and chewing cycle kinematics to masticatory performance
    Lepley, Casey R.
    Throckmorton, Gaylord S.
    Ceen, Richard F.
    Buschang, Peter H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 139 (05) : 606 - 613
  • [10] Maximum voluntary bite force, occlusal contact points and associated stresses on posterior teeth
    van Vuuren, Ludwig Jansen
    Broadbent, Jonathan M.
    Duncan, Warwick J.
    Waddell, John N.
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND, 2020, 50 (01) : 132 - 143