Hip resurfacing requires larger acetabular cups than conventional hip replacement: A comparative analysis of 100 hips, based on radiographic templating

被引:0
作者
Schmidutz, Florian [1 ]
Fottner, Andreas [1 ]
Wanke-Jellinek, Lorenz [1 ]
Steinbrueck, Arnd [1 ]
Jansson, Volkmar [1 ]
Mazzochian, Farhad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Munich LMU, Dept Orthopaed Surg, D-81377 Munich, Germany
来源
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA | 2012年 / 78卷 / 04期
关键词
hip resurfacing; total hip arthroplasty; hip arthroplasty; acetabulum; bone loss; ARTHROPLASTY; BONE; REMOVAL; COMPONENTS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Acetabular bone loss is a matter for concern in hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA), as preservation of the femoral head and neck might demand a larger acetabular cup than in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Using radiographic templating, the cup size required for either THA or HRA was calculated on 100 pelvic films. First, the cup size was determined based on the dimensions of the acetabulum. Then, the cup size for HRA was evaluated taking into account the dimensions of the femoral head/neck. The average cup size required for HRA was larger than for THA (Delta + 1.1 mm). The cup size for HRA and THA was similar in 49% of hips; in 51% of the hips the cup required for HRA was larger : one size larger in 31%, two sizes larger in 18% and three sizes larger in 2% of the cases. The greatest difference and highest bone loss were observed for the large sizes (between 52 and 56 mm) and thus predominantly in men (Delta + 1.5 mm male, Delta + 0.7 mm female). This study shows that HRA requires a larger acetabular cup in more than 50% of the cases compared to THA. When planning HRA surgeons should remember that cup size is determined by the size of the matching femoral component and that size difference with THA increases with increasing hip sizes.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 491
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty
    Ball, Scott T.
    Le Duff, Michel J.
    Amstutz, Harlan C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (04) : 735 - 741
  • [2] Beaulé PE, 2006, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V88B, P838, DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.88B6.18083
  • [3] Bhutta MA, 2011, ACTA ORTHOP BELG, V77, P128
  • [4] Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty
    Bono, JV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A : 118 - 122
  • [5] Hip resurfacing: expectations and limitations
    De Smet, K.
    Calistri, A.
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2009, 80 (05) : 625 - 626
  • [6] Delport HP, 2011, ACTA ORTHOP BELG, V77, P125
  • [7] Garellick G., 2009, SWEDISH HIP ARTHROPL
  • [8] EBRA - A METHOD TO MEASURE MIGRATION OF ACETABULAR COMPONENTS
    KRISMER, M
    BAUER, R
    TSCHUPIK, J
    MAYRHOFER, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1995, 28 (10) : 1225 - 1236
  • [9] Benefits of Thin-Shelled Acetabular Components for Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
    Le Duff, Michel J.
    Wang, Chen Ti
    Wisk, Lauren E.
    Takamura, Kohtaroh B.
    Amstutz, Harlan C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2010, 28 (12) : 1665 - 1670
  • [10] Removal of acetabular bone in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip - A comparison with hybrid total hip arthroplasty
    Loughead, JM
    Starks, I
    Chesney, D
    Matthews, JNS
    McCaskie, AW
    Holland, JP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2006, 88B (01): : 31 - 34